Experience of ipsilateral laparoseopic reoperations in urology
- VernacularTitle:泌尿外科同侧二次腹腔镜手术体会
- Author:
Liang MA
;
Damin YU
;
Zhigen ZHANG
;
Xinde LI
;
Xuefang RUI
;
Gonghui LI
;
Guoqing DING
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Laparoscopes;
Reoperation Urology operation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Urology
2008;29(9):609-612
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the feasibility and clinical results of laparoseopic reoperation for patients with history of previous ipsilateral urology laparoscopic surgeries. Methods Thirteen patients that underwent second ipsilateral urology laparoscopic surgeries were retrospectively ana-lysed. The reasons for a second operation included nonfunctional kidney after pyeloplasty, ure-terolithotomy or pyelolithotomy in 4 cases, recurrence of urinary calculi in 3 cases, pelviureteric june-tional stenosis after pyeloplasty in 1 case, recurrence of renal cyst in 1 case, recurrence of adrenal tumor in 1 case, residual adrenal tumor in 1 case, progression of polycystic kidney in 1 case and renal carcinoma after laparoscopic surgery for renal cyst in 1 case. Transperitoneal laparoscopie surgeries were performed in all cases and the first trocar was placed with open incision to avoid puncture injury. The adhesion between intestines and retroperitoneal space was dissected to expose the operative field. The lateral peritoneum and perirenal fascia were sutured after surgery in all cases except nephrectomy cases. Results For the first operation, the mean operative time was 93 min, the mean estimated blood loss was 70 ml and the average postoperative hospital stay was 4.8 d. The second operations on the 13 cases were successfully performed with mean operative time of 97 rain, mean estimated blood loss of 62 ml and average postoperative hospital stay of 5.0 d which were not significantly different from the first operation parameters(P＞0.05). During the secondary operations, adhesions and abnor-mal anatomic structure observed increased the difficulty of surgery. All patients after secondary opera-tions were followed up for 2--24 months and no major complication was observed. Conclusion La-paroscopic reoperation on patients with history of ipsilateral urology laparoscopic surgery is feasible in skilled and experienced hands and in properly selected cases.
