Clinical analysis of different hysterectomy approaches on 710 cases
- VernacularTitle:三种子宫全切术式临床疗效比较
- Author:
Li MA
;
Ailing SHAO
;
Lixiao WANG
;
Jianmin DONG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Hysterectomy;
Postoperative;
Complications
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2008;15(10):1606-1607
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical effects of total abdominal hysterectomy(TAH), laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy(LAVH) and transvaginal hysterectomy(TVH). Methods A retrespective analysis was conduc-ted in 710 women underwent different hysterectomy approaches,includlng 397 patients underdoing TAH,176 underdo-ing LAVH and 137 treated with TVH. Results Uterine volume, operative pelvis, pelvic adhesion were main factors infulencing different operative styles for hysterectomy ( P<0.05 ). Compared with TAH, LAVH, TVH, the operation time,blood loss ,operation complicafion and recovery time of intestinal function were significantly difference(P<0.05). Conclusion Uterine volume, pelvic adhesion, operative pelvis were major factors influencing different operative styles for hysterectomy. The clinical efficacy of TVH is best,which is less time, minimal invasion, shorter recovery time and lower cost. The application of LAVH provides a promising microinvasive approach for vaginal hysterectomy which can make operation easy, visual field clear and is worthy to be advocated too.
