Relationship between hormone therapy in women with ovarian malignancy and prognosis
- VernacularTitle:卵巢恶性肿瘤患者手术后激素治疗对其预后影响的初步探讨
- Author:
Li LI
;
Zhongmian PAN
;
Xinqiu CHEN
;
Kun GAO
;
Wei ZHANG
;
Yuan LUO
;
Zhongqiang YAO
;
Xinqiang LIANG
;
Wei HUANG
;
Desheng YAO
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Ovarian neoplasms;
Hormone replacement therapy;
Quality of life;
Prognosis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
2008;43(11):843-848
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the relationship between hormone therapy (HT) in women withovarian malignancy and prognosis. Methods HT was used in 31 patients with ovarian cancer after surgery,and 44 eases with ovarian eaneer served as controL The expression of estrogen receptor (ER)α, ERβ andprogesterone receptor (PR) was detected by immunohistoehemieal staining respectively. The level of serumealeitonin and transforming growth factor α (TGFα) was detected by radio-immune and enzyme-linkedimmunosorbent assay pre- or post-surgery, as well as half a year to one year later post-surgery respectively inthese eases. The survival curve of Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test as well as scale risk of Cox model wereused to analyze the relationship between HT and prognosis of ovarian cancer. Results ( 1 ) The results oflog-rank test showed that there was no difference in survival curve of patients with or without HT [ (1108±52), (1086±43) d; P=0.940] ; the results of scale risk of Cox model also showed that HT was not anindependent prognosis factor for patients with HT. (2) There was no relationship with HT and theaccumulated survival in patients with either positive or negative expression of ERa, ERβ and PR in tissue;as well as between HT and the level of serum TGFα pre-, post-surgery, or half a year to one year aftersurgery. (3) The level of serum caleitonin in patients without HT post-surgery half a year to one year laterwas higher than that pre-surgery [ (141±13), (95±11) μg/; P<0.05], but there was no significantdifference between patients with HT half a year to one year later past-surgery and pre-surgery [ (90±18)μg/L, (93±14) μ/L; P>0.05]. (4) There was a significant difference in body and emotion function between HT and without HT groups [(1.84±1.50), (1.45±0.82); (12.69±10.20), (12.90±11.61); P<0.05], as well as in sex quality and autonomic nerve maladjustment and in the special listmade [(1.05±0.74), (1.77±1.08); (10.10±3.21), (13.09±4.30); P<0.05]. ConclusionsThere is no adverse influence on prognosis in using of HT for patients with ovarian cancer after surgery. HTfor patients with ovarian cancer post-surgery can help keep a stable level of scmm calcitonin as well asimprove the quality of life.