The value of heart-type fatty acid-binding protein for early diagnosis of blunt cardiac injury
10.3760/cma.j.issa.1671-0282.2009.04.021
- VernacularTitle:心肌型脂肪酸结合蛋白在钝性心脏损伤早期诊断中的价值
- Author:
Yuhuang LANG
;
Jingfeng MIAO
;
Ming XIANG
;
Hui LIU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein;
Blunt cardiac injury;
Troponin I;
12-lead Elecowar diography
- From:
Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
2009;18(4):415-419
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To study the value of heart-type fatty acid-binding protein(H-FABP)for the early diagnosis of blunt cardiac injury(BCI).Method A prospective stuay was carried out in 42 patients,who suffered from blunt thoracic injury and were admitted from January 2007 to June 2008,and another42 heathy individuals in the health center of the Shanghai Fifth Hospital were recruited as control.Serum H-FABP,cTn Ⅰ and Myo levels of both healthy individuals and petients at 3,6 and 12 hours after trauma were measured by using ELLSA.Serum cTn Ⅰ levels was taken as a golden standard for the diagnosis of BCI.Accroding to serum cTn Ⅰ levels.42 patients with blunt thoracic injury were divided into group of patient with myocardial damage(13 patients)and group of patients without(29 patients).The receiver operating characteristic curves(ROC)of H-FABP and cTn Ⅰ in the diagnosis of BCI drawed at 3,6 and 12 hours after trauma,respectively,and the areas under curve(AUC)of ROC were compared.The values of H-FABP and cTn Ⅰ for diagnosing at 3,6 and 12 hours after trauma were analyzed Differences in serum H-FABP,cTn Ⅰ and Myo concentrations between groups were compared by Kruskal Wallis tegt.The delong.clarkepearson test was used to compare the areas under the ROC curves.Results AUCH-FABP and AUCcTn Ⅰfor diagnosing BCI at 3 hours after trauma were 0.9257 and0.6844,respectively,and AUCH-FABF was significantly more than AUCcTn Ⅰ(P=0.0125).AUCH-FABP,was significantly less than AUCcTnⅠ(0.9841 vs0.8276,P=0.0278)for diagnosing BCI at 12 hours after trauma.There was no significant difference in diagnosing BCI between AUCH-FABp and AUCcTn Ⅰat 12 hours after trauma(0.9655 vs.0.9125,P=0.2609).Conclusions H-FABP is valuabe in the early diagnosis of BCI,and its sensitivity is higherthanthat of cTnⅠ in diagnosing BCI at 3 hours after trauma.
