A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Functional Outcomes and Complications Following the Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate and Monopolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate.
10.5534/wjmh.2016.34.2.110
- Author:
Dong Hyuk KANG
1
;
Kang Su CHO
;
Won Sik HAM
;
Young Deuk CHOI
;
Joo Yong LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, Severance Hospital, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. joouro@yuhs.ac
- Publication Type:Meta-Analysis ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Original Article
- Keywords:
Lasers;
Meta-analysis;
Prostatic hyperplasia;
Transurethral resection of prostate
- MeSH:
Catheterization;
Catheters;
Contracture;
Hospitalization;
Humans;
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms;
Male;
Neck;
Odds Ratio;
Operative Time;
Prostate*;
Prostatic Hyperplasia;
Transurethral Resection of Prostate;
Urethral Stricture;
Urinary Bladder;
Urinary Retention;
Urinary Tract Infections;
Volatilization*
- From:The World Journal of Men's Health
2016;34(2):110-122
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (MTURP) and photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) in order to provide the most up-to-date and reliable recommendations possible. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relevant RCTs were identified from electronic databases for meta-analysis of the surgical outcomes and complications of MTURP and PVP. Meta-analytical comparisons were made using qualitative and quantitative syntheses. The outcome variables are presented as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: In total, 11 articles were included in this comparative analysis of PVP versus MTURP. Most of the recently published studies exhibited low risk in terms of quality assessment. MTURP was superior to PVP regarding operative time; however, with regard to catheterization and hospitalization time, the mean differences were -1.39 (95% CI=-1.83~-0.95, p<0.001) and -2.21 (95% CI=-2.73~-1.69, p<0.001), respectively, in favor of PVP. PVP was superior to MTURP with regard to transfusion rate and clot retention, but no statistically significant differences were found with regard to acute urinary retention and urinary tract infection. The long-term complications of bladder neck contracture and urethral stricture showed no statistically significant differences between PVP and MTURP. Long-term functional outcomes, including the International Prostate Symptom Score and maximum flow rate, likewise did not display statistically significant differences between PVP and MTURP. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings, we believe that PVP should be considered as an alternative surgical procedure for treating male lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia.
