Vaginal paravaginal repair plus vaginal bridge repair in treatment of female pelvic organ prolapse
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2009.21.001
- VernacularTitle:经阴道行阴道旁修补术联合阴道后壁桥式修补术在女性盆腔器官脱垂治疗中的应用
- Author:
Xiaohong RUAN
;
Zhongming LUO
;
Ailian YANG
;
Xuemei ZHAN
;
Xiaoqin LIAN
;
Baoning WEN
;
Yingrou RONG
;
Bo ZHEN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Uterine prolapse;
,Cystocele;
Posterior vaginal wall prolapse;
Reconstructive surgical procedures
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2009;32(21):1-4
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the effectiveness and safety of vaginal paravaginal repair(VPVR) plus vaginal bridge repair in the treatment of female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods Sixty-five patients with different defects of pelvic floor underwent VPVR or plus vaginal bridge repair for posterior vaginal wall. Patients were followed up after operation. The cure rate was estimated subjectively and objectively. The patients' quality of life was evaluated by the pelvic floor distress inventory short form 20 (PFDI-20). Results All 65 cases were treated by vaginal hysterectomy and anterior vaginal repair, in which there were 33 cases underwent VPVR while 32 cases underwent VPVR plus middle area repair. Forty concomitant procedures for vaginal bridge repair were also performed. The average operative time was (110.00±20.12) min and blood loss was (119.52±45.33) ml. The symptom of stress urinary incontinence of 25 cases significantly released after operation. Four incision recovery delayed and there were no other complicatious occurred. Patients were followed up for 6-29 months,the objective cure rate was 100.00% (65/65) and subjective cure rate was 92.31%(60/65), and 58 cases (89.23%)improved significantly with the quality of life comparing with that of pre-operation by completing PFDI-20 (P<0.01). Conclusions It is an effective and safe procedure for VPVR plus vaginal bridge repair to correct median to severe anterior vaginal prolapse and posterior vaginal wall prolapse. More clinical trials are needed to evaluate their long-term outcome.
