Laparoscopic versus open surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-631X.2009.07.009
- VernacularTitle:腹腔镜与开腹结直肠癌根治术临床疗效的比较
- Author:
Mujun YIN
;
Shan WANG
;
Yingjiang YE
;
Kewei JIANG
;
Xiaodong YANG
;
Zhanlong SHEN
;
Qiwei XIE
;
Feng XU
;
Shijie LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Colorectal neoplasms;
Laparoscopes;
Proctocolectomy,restorative
- From:
Chinese Journal of General Surgery
2009;24(7):543-546
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the therapeutic efficiency of laparoscopic and open radical colorectal surgery in the treatment of colorectal carcinoma. Methods Clinical data of 77 cases undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery from September 2004 to October 2007 were compared with 90 patients treated by open surgery. Results Mean operating time was longer in the laparoseopic group than that in the open group [248 minutes vs. 225 minutes (t = -2. 11 ,P =0. 036)], blood loss was less in laparoscopic group [210 ml vs. 315 ml (t = 2. 82, P = 0. 005)]. Laparoscopic surgery was associated with lower rate of analgesia use [48% vs. 80% (x2 = 18. 69 ,P < 0. 01)], earlier recovery of bowel function [2. 9 days vs. 4. 3 days(t =5.59,P <0. 01)]and shorter hospital stay [12. 5 days vs. 15.5 days (t =2. 32,P=0. 039)]compared with open surgery. The number of removed lymph nodes [14. 2 vs. 15.3 (t = 1.04, P = 0. 3)]and length of reseeted bowel [18. 9 cm vs. 20. 0 cm, (t = 0. 88,P = 0. 383)]were not different between the two groups. The mean follow-up time of the two groups were 28 months, local recurrence rate, metachronous metastases rate and 3-year cumulative survival rate were not statistically different between the two groups. Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery is as effective as conventional open surgery in the treatment of colorectal carcinoma.
