Comparison of the circumferential approach and suprapubic approach for correcting concealed penis
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2009.08.019
- VernacularTitle:环切人路和耻骨上入路隐匿阴茎矫正术疗效比较
- Author:
Jing PENG
;
Zhichao ZHANG
;
Yiming YUAN
;
Weidong SONG
;
Yiguang WU
;
Bing GAO
;
Zhongcheng XIN
;
Jie JIN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Penile diseases;
Surgical procedures,elective
- From:
Chinese Journal of Urology
2009;30(8):559-561
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the circumferential approach and suprapubic approach for correcting the concealed penis. Methods Thirty-four patients received circumferential approach (group A,18 cases)or suprapubic approach(group B,15 cases)randomly for the concealed penis.The length of penis without erection before and after surgery treatment,patients'satisfaction and surgical complications were evaluated.All the patients were followed at least 6 months after operation.Results The penile length before and after surgery in group A were(1.78±0.41)cm vs(3.97±0.47)cm,the length of the postoperative penis was significantly longer than that of the preoperative penis(P<0.01).83%of those in group A(15 cases)were satisfied with the cosmic results.The length of preoperative and postoperative penis in group B were(2.07±0.53)cm vs(4.05±0.81)cm respectively,the length of the postoperative penis was significantly longer(P<0.01).Satisfaction was 87%(13 cases).The postoperative penile length between the 2 groups was not different(P> 0.05).Prepuce edema was reported to Occur in 56%and 13%in group A and group B and spontaneously disappeared within 3 months.Fat synchysis occurred in 2 of group B. Conclusions The cosmic effect of the 2 surgical approaches is similar,but circumferential approach is simpler.There is no serious complication in those receiving circumferential approach.
