Clinical value of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome score in evaluating prognosis for patients with liver failure
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368.2009.10.015
- VernacularTitle:应用多器官功能障碍综合征评分评估肝功能衰竭预后的临床价值
- Author:
Zhongsheng JIANG
;
Xiaofeng WEN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Liver failure;
Evaluation studies;
Prognosis
- From:
Chinese Journal of General Practitioners
2009;8(10):714-717
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To study clinical value of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) score to evaluate prognosis for patients with liver failure. Methods A total of 189 patients with liver failure were recruited into the study, 125 deaths and 64 survivals. Their vital sign, platelets count (PLT), prothrombin time (PT) and international normalized ratio of PT (INRPT), fraction of inhaled oxygen (FiO2), arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2), serum levels of total bilirubin (TB), albumin (ALB), creatinine (Cr), pressure-adjusted heart rate (PAHR), glasgow coma score (GCS), degree of aacitic fluid (DAF) and stage of hepatic encephalopathy (SHE) were evaluated within 24 hours after admission. Each of the patients scored according to the criteria of MODS score, Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score. Difference in MODS score between death and survival groups was compared and accuracy of prognosis of MODS score, CTP score and MELD score were evaluated by the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Survival time of patients in the two groups classified by their MODS scores was compared with Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival curve. Results There was significant difference in PT, INRPT, PaO2, Cr, GCS, SHE between death and survival groups, but there was no difference in TB, ALB, PLT, FiO2, PHAR and DAF between them. Mean score of MODS in death group (9±2) was significantly higher than that in survival group (7±1) (t=9.076, P<0.01). The area under ROC curve (AUC) of MODS score (0.814) was close to that of MELD score (0.827), but higher than that of CTP score (0.714). There was significant difference in survival time between the varied groups classified by MODS score (χ2=72.451, P<0.01). Conclusions Clinical value of MODS score is equivalent to that of MELD score in evaluating prognosis for patients with liver failure, even better than that of CTP score, which can be used to evaluate short-term prognosis for patients with liver failure.
