Detection of aberrant methylation of RARβ2, GSTP1 and DAPK gene in prostate cancer and its clinical significance
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-9026.2009.09.020
- VernacularTitle:前列腺癌组织中多基因异常甲基化检测及临床意义
- Author:
Jingjing HE
;
Yijie MAO
;
Gang XU
;
Wei WU
;
Zhihua TAO
;
Mo SHEN
;
Xiuling WU
;
Zhanguo CHEN
;
Wu ZHOU
;
Wei CHEN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Prostatic neoplasms;
Gene;
DNA methylation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
2009;28(9):760-764
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore hypermethylation of RARβ2, GSTP1 and DAPK gene in prostate cancer tissues, and to explore its correlation with clinicopathological features of prostate cancer and its diagnostic value. Methods Hypermethylation of RARe2, GSTP1 and DAPK gene was detected by nested methylation-specific PCR (NMSP) in 57 prostate cancer (PCa) tissues and 35 benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) tissues. The correlation between hypermethylation and clinicopathological features of prostate cancer and its diagnostic value were analyzed. Results The hypermethylation frequencies of RARβ2, GSTP1 and DAPK gene in PCa were significantly higher than those in BPH (RARβ2: 52.6% vs. 0% GSTP1: 61.4% vs. 2.9%;DAPK: 43.9% vs. 8.6%;all P<0.01). The methylation rate of RARβ2 gene was directly correlated with distinct Gleason scores and clinical stage (4～7 score vs. 8～10 score: 34.8% vs. 64.7%;stage B, C vs. stage D: 37.0% vs. 66.7%;x2=4.927 and 5.004, P=0.026 and 0.025). The methylation rate of GSTP1 gene was significantly different in patients with different Gleason scores (4～7 score vs. 8～10 score: 43.5% vs. 73.5%;x2 =11.530, P=0.001), but had no difference in patients with distinct clinical stage (stage B, C vs. stage D: 51.9% vs. 70.0%;x2=1.975, P=0.16) . There was no difference in DAPK gene methylation rate among patients with different Gleason scores and distinct clinical stage (4 ～7 score vs. 8～10 score: 39.1% vs. 50.0%;stage B, C vs. stage D: 33.3% vs. 53.3%;x2= 1.290 and 2.309, both P～0.05). GSTP1 gene showed the highest sensitivity of 61.4% (35/57)with specificity of 97.1%(34/35), while RARβ2 gene had the highest specificity of 100% (35/35) with the sensitivity of 52.6% (30/57). The sensitivity and specificity of DAPK gene were 43.9% and 91.4% (25/57 and 32/35), respeetively. When the hypermethylation of RARβ2, GSTP1 and DAPK gene were detected together, the diagnostic sensitivity was increased, but the specificity was decreased. Conclusions The aberrant methylation of RARβ2, GSTP1 and DAPK gene is correlated with tumorigenesis and progression of prostate cancer, which may be used as an effective diagnostic marker for prostate cancer.
