Assessment of Patency of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts Using Segmented K-space Breath-hold Cine Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Clinical Feasibility Study.
- Author:
Oh Choon KWON
1
;
Sub LEE
;
Jong Ki KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Segmented K-space imaging;
Coronary bypass graft;
Flow analysis;
CABG patency;
FASTCARD
- MeSH:
Angiography;
Arteries;
Coronary Artery Bypass*;
Coronary Artery Disease;
Coronary Vessels*;
Feasibility Studies*;
Humans;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging*;
Mammary Arteries;
Myocardial Ischemia;
Saphenous Vein;
Transplants;
Veins
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
2003;7(1):22-30
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating coronary artery disease has been reported. In this study, we evaluated the usefulness of breath-hold segmented K-space cine MR imaging for evaluating the patency of coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty eight patients with a total of 92 CABGs (36 internal thoracic arteries and 56 saphenous vein grafts) were evaluated using segmented Kspace cardiac-gated fast gradient echo sequence (2D-FASTCARD) MR imaging. MR magnitude images were evaluated from the hard copies by two independent observers. A graft was defined as patent if it was seen as a bright small round area on at least two consecutive images throughout the cardiac cycle at a position consistent with the expected location for that graft. RESULTS: MR images were obtained successfully for 23 patients (61%). The sagittal planes were most helpful in visualizing the cross-section of sapheneous vein bypass graft to left circumflex artery branch, whereas the transverse planes were used for identification of internal mammary artery grafts to left anterior descending coronary artery or its branch and identification of saphenous vein grafts to right coronary artery. Forty five grafts were visible using this MR technique, while the grafts were not visible on seven saphenous vein grafts and two internal mammary artery grafts. In two patients showing symptoms of myocardial ischemia, one or two bypass grafts were not visible. Imaging, perpendicular plane to a CABG was important to visualize the flow inside the CABG with maximum sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of patency of the bypass graft was clinically feasible by 2DFASTCARD MR imaging, whereas any invisible bypass grafts should be further studied by contrast-enhanced MR angiography or by conventional angiography for confirmation of abnormalities.
