Comparison between MR relaxometry techniques and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in evaluation of osteoporotic postmenopausal rats
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2010.01.023
- VernacularTitle:MR弛豫技术与双能X线吸收法评价大鼠骨质疏松的比较研究
- Author:
Hejia WU
;
Sirun LIU
;
Jian GONG
;
Hao XU
;
Guangyu JIANG
;
Longhui LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Magnetic resonance imaging;
Densitometry,X-rey;
Osteoporosis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiology
2010;44(1):96-100
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate MR relaxometry techniques and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for the diagnosis of osteoporotic diseases in rats. Methods Thirty 3-month-old female rats were randomly divided (using completely randomized grouping method) into two groups (each contained 15 rats). Animals in group A without osteoporotic castration were included as normal controls, whereas osteoporotic castration was created in each animal in group B. Three parameters (BMC, BMD, Hbmdl)was measured for both groups by DXA at two time points, one immediately before the castration and another at the 12 th week after the castration. Then animals from the control group and the osteoporotic group went through the following three diagnostic procedures using a 1.5 T MR system: (1) A fast multi echo gradient echo (MEGRE) pulse train sequence with different inter-echo intervals (1000, 500, 400, 300, 200, 100) to obtain the T_2~* value. (2) A multi-echo fast spin echo sequence to obtain the T_2map. (3) A conventional spin-echo (CSE) sequence to obtain the T_1map. The statistical difference between group A and group B was tested by t-test to analyze parameters. And, the most significant parameter for diagnosis ofosteoporotic diseases was picked out from all parameters by Fisher Sequential diseriminant analysis. At the end of experiments, animals were killed and histopathological examination was performed on the femurs of animals from both control and osteoporotic groups. Results (1) Histopathological examination confirmed the presence of osteoperosis in all animals in group B. (2) BMD was picked out from 3 DXA parameters (BMC,BMD,Hbmdl) by fisher stepwise discriminant analysis, and its discriminant rates was 87.6%. (3) All 2-sample t-test results(t=6.20, 4.79, 5.18, 5.22, 5.59, 4.37, 6.14, 5.12, 5.09, 4.99, 5.57, 4.84, 4.07, 2.98, 6.75 individually) for MR relaxometry parameters(T_2~* 1000,R_2~* 1000,T_2~* 500,R-2~* 500,T_2~* 400,R_2~* 400,T_2~* 300,R_2~* 300,T_2~* 200, R_2~* 200, T_2~* 100, R_2~* 100, T_2map, R_2map, T_1map) showed statistically significant differences between groups A and B (P=0.01 for T_2~* map, P=0.00 for all other parameters) except the R_2map(P=0.07). (4) Using fisher stepwise discriminafion method in the analysis of 14 parameters of MR relaxometry techniques and 3 parameters of dual X-ray absorptiometry(T_2~* 1000,T_2~* 500,T_2~* 400,T_2~* 300,T_2~* 200,T_2~* 100,T_2map, R_2~* 1000, R_2~* 500, R_2~* 400, R_2~* 300, R_2~* 2OO, R_2~* 100,T_1map,BMC,BMD,Hbmdl), we found that the most significant difference was from the T_2map and T_1map. Conclusions The MR relaxometry parameter-T_2map in the present study is shown to be appropriate parameter for the diagnosis of osteoperotie diseases, and stability of magnetic field plays an important role in this process. It would be the optimal method to make a diagnosis of osteoporotic diseases with both MR relaxometry and DXA technological means.
