Role of endothelial bioreactor device in sepsis porcine model
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2010.01.014
- VernacularTitle:内皮细胞生物反应器在猪脓毒血症中的应用
- Author:
Junfeng LIU
;
Yi PING
;
Qionghong XIE
;
Jiaying ZHANG
;
Li YOU
;
Jianyong ZHONG
;
Weimin DIANG
;
Yi LI
;
Bobin CHEN
;
Yong GU
;
Shanyan DIN
;
Feng DING
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Sepsis;
Endothelial bioreaetor device;
Hemodynamics
- From:
Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
2010;19(1):47-51
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the role of endothelial bioreacter device in sepsis porcine model.Method Sepsis porcine model was induced gy established endotoxin (LPS,0.25 mg·kg~(-1)) in healthy hybrid swines. The animals were randomly divided(random number) into endothelial bioreactor device group(EBR group) and sham circulation group( Sham group)( n = 6, respectively). After the infusion of endotoxin, extracorporeal circulation was started with the blood flow of 30 mL/min. The blood went through the endothelial bioreactor, then went back to the body via internal jugular vein in the EBR group. The bioreactor with the same size and without endothelial cells(ECs) was used in the sham group. Hemodynamic variables, blood biochemistry, inflammatory markers, Endothelin-1(ET-11) and yon Willebrand Factor(vWF) were examined just before and every hour after the injection. When the survival time of the animals was recorded,the animals were sacrificed to calculate the lung injury score. The time-dependent hemodynamics and cytokine data were compared between groups by repeated measurement ANOVA .Student's t -test was used to analyze the survival time. Results The mean artetial blood pressure (MAP) remarkably decreased in both groups after LPS injection, while the decreasing rate in EBR group was significantly lower than that in control group after 2 hours( P < 0.05). The ET- 1 level in EBR group increased after a slight decrease at the beginning, while that in the sham group went on increasing(P<0.01). The vWF levels increased first, then returned to the baseline in the sixth hour in both groups, while the change in EBR group was significantly less than that in the sham group(P<0.05). The Lung Injury Score in EBR-treated group was significantly lower than that in the sham group(6.1 ± 0.9 vs. 8.2 ± 1. 0, P < 0.05). These physiologic and biochemical alterations were associated with a significant advantage to the survivals in the EBR group when compared with the control sham group(6.7 ± 1.32 vs. 5.2 ± 0.61 h, P < 0.01 ). Conclusions Timely intervention in endotoxin shock with EC therapy by using tissue-engineered bioreactor may improve cardiovascular performance and alter the natural course of this disease process, probably via modulating ioflammation and coagulation cascades.
