Comparison of different surgical techniques for treatment of concealed penis
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2010.02.020
- VernacularTitle:隐匿阴茎不同术式的疗效比较
- Author:
Boyong LI
;
Guofu ZHANG
;
Huan WANG
;
Xiuying TANG
;
Bin LI
;
Xinqiu FAN
;
Haiyue LIN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Concealed penis;
Surgical procedures;
elective
- From:
Chinese Journal of Urology
2010;31(2):128-130
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the effects of different surgical techniques for treatment of concealed penis. Methods A retrospective review of 219 patients underwent surgical correction of concealed penis between 1986 and 2007 was performed. The mean age was (10.3±2.4) years(3-15 years). The penile length was (1.9±0. 5)cm(0. 5-3. 0 cm)before operation. Ninty-three patients were the severe degree of concealed penis. The others were the moderate degree. All patients under-went operation with different techniques, including Johnston's technique in 34, Devine's technique in 42, modified Devinds technique in 125 and Brisson's technique in 18. The increased length of penile af-ter operation was compared among the 4 groups with different surgical techniques by statistical meth-od. Results The postoperative increased length of penile in Johnston's technique, Devine's tech-nique, modified Devine's technique and Brisson's technique was (1.8 ± 0. 4) cm, (2. 0 ± 0. 5) cm, (2.1±0.4)cm and (2.3±0.4)cm respectively. The difference was significant by ANOVA test (F=13.1,P<0. 001). Devines technique, modified DevineSs technique and Brisson's technique were better than Johnston's technique considering the increased length of penile. The complication of severe penile lymphedema of 4 groups developed in 8, 5, 6 and 2 patients respectively. Conclusion Modified De-vine's technique has the satisfactory increasing of penile length for treatment of concealed penis and less complication rate after operation.
