Preoperative diagnosis of hepatic angiomyolipomas using real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound: comparison with contrast-enhanced helical CT
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2010.06.009
- VernacularTitle:肝血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的超声造影与增强螺旋CT对比研究
- Author:
Rui LI
;
Xiaohang ZHANG
;
Hua ZHONG
;
Xing HUA
;
Yanli GUO
;
Aimin GUO
;
Zhaohui CHEN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Ultrasonography;
Microbubbles;
Liver neoplasms;
Angiomyolipomas
- From:
Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
2010;19(6):485-488
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To observe the perfusion pattern of hepatic angiomyolipomas using contrastenhanced ultrasound(CEUS) and compare diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound with contrastenhanced helical CT(CECT).Methods Nineteen patients with 21 resected and pathologically proven hepatic angiomyolipomas were included in this study.Low mechanical index (mechanical index less than 0.2) realtime CEUS was performed in nineteen patients (5 patients with pulse inversion harmonic, 14 patients with contrast pulse sequencing, CPS) after 2.4ml bolus injection of contrast agent SonoVue.CECT was performed using 16-slice helical CT and contrast agent Ultravist.The diagnostic performance was calculated by considering histologic results as the reference standards.Results Fifteen tumors were correctly diagnosed as hepatic angiomyolipomas,4 tumors were misdiagnosed (including 1 hepatocellular carcinoma,2hepatic adenomas, 1 hemangioma) and 2 tumors were characterized as benign lesions by CEUS.Eight tumors were correctly diagnosed as hepatic angiomyolipomas, 13 tumors were misdiagnosed (including 7hepatocellular carcinoma, 1 liposarcoma, 2 lipomas, 1 hepatic adenomas, 2 hemangiomas) by CECT.The preoperative diagnostic accuracy was 71.4% for CEUS and 38.1 % for CECT(P＜0.05 ).Conclusions CEUS can demonstrate typical imaging characteristics of most hepatic angiomyolipomas, and has higher diagnostic performance than CECT in characterization of hepatic angiomyotipomas.
