Clinical analysis of efficacy between Laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy

VernacularTitle:腹腔镜子宫全切术与经腹部子宫全切术的疗效对比分析
Author: Qun XIAO
Publication Type:Journal Article
Keywords: Non-prolapsed Utenus; Hystereetomy; Laparoscope
From: Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy 2010;17(15):2032-2033
CountryChina
Language:Chinese
Abstract: Objective To evaluate and compare the advantages and disadvantages and the clinical applica- _ tion between abdominal hysterectomy (AH) and laparoscopically hysterectomy ( LAH) on the benign lesions of Non-prolapsed Uterus. Methods 400 patients with benign lesions of Non-prolapsed Uterus were divided into two groups. They were AH group (202 cases) and LAH group (198 cases). The effects of clinical treatment of the two groups were compared. Results In LAH group anal exhaust time,postoperative morbidity,length of stay were less than those in AH group,the difference was statistically significant(P <0. 05 ). The cost of LAH group was higher,and all symptoms were relieved after opreation. In LAH group,the average recovery time of the surgery to return to work time was(21 ± 7) d, but in AH group that was( 36 ± 8 ) d. The differences of recovery rime between two groups were statistically significantly ( P < 0.05). In two groups B-myoma were not found obvious by follow-up. Conclusion Different surgical patterns of hysterectomy had their distinctive advantages. The key point of a successful operation was to avoid complications of the operation.