Comparison study between uterine artery embolization combines uterine curettage and surgidal treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6315.2010.10.035
- VernacularTitle:子宫动脉灌注栓塞联合清宫术与手术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的对照研究
- Author:
Hongwen ZHANG
;
Xiaojun DENG
;
Liping DENG
;
Chun LI
;
Shijiao DUAN
;
Weihua XIE
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Cesarean section;
Scar pregnancy;
Uterine curettage;
Gynaecologic surgery
- From:
Clinical Medicine of China
2010;26(10):1095-1098
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To determine the treatment effect of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) and provide theoretical guidance in selecting proper treatment for this disease. Methods Sixty-two patients were randomly divided into 2 groups taken uterine artery embolization combines uterine curettage (combination group,n = 32) and gynaecologic surgery (surgery group, n = 30) respectively. The operation time, blood loss, intraoperative fluid volume, uterine retention rate, hospitalization days and medical expense of two groups were recorded and compared.The complication occurrence of both short-term and long-term was observed, and the results in two groups were compared. Long term and short term occurrence of complications were also observed. Results No significant difference in preoperative indicators was found between two groups, includes average age, menopause time, blood β-HCG value,gestational sac diameter,the amount of vaginal bleeding (P ＞ 0. 05 ). But after the operation,we found significant difference between the combination group and surgical group in uterine retention rates (96.9% (31/32)and 20.0% (6/30) respectively, P ＜ 0. 01 ). The significant differences were also observed in operative time (42. 0 ±13.2) min and ( 120.0 ± 34.5 ) min respectively, P ＜ 0. 001 ); average hospitalization days ( (7.0 ± 1.0)days and ( 15.0 ± 2.0) days respectively, P ＜ 0. 001 ); medical expense ( $ 9143.5 ± 864.3 and $ 11 371.7 ±1621.0 respectively, P ＜ 0. 001 ) between the combination group and surgical group. During hospitalization,complication occurred in 1 case in combination group and in 7 cases in surgery group, of which mild complications were seen in 6 and serious complication in 1 patient. No treatment-related complications occurred in long-term observation in neither of the groups. The complication occurrence in combination group and surgery group were 3.1%(1/32) and 23.3% (7/30) respectively ,with a significant difference between two groups (P ＜ 0.01 ). Conclusions In the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy, the uterine artery embolization combines uterine curettage therapy is superior to gynaecologic surgery for its shorter operative time, less infusion quantity, higher uterine retention rate,fewer complications, shorter time of hospitalization, less medical expense and better security.
