Cervical artificial disc replacement: indications and outcomes
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2010.09.002
- VernacularTitle:人工颈椎间盘置换术适应证及疗效探讨
- Author:
Xun MA
;
Gang MA
;
Haoyu FENG
;
Wenhui SONG
;
Jianzhong HUO
;
Kai CUI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Cervical spondylosis;
Decompression,surgical;
Intervertebral disk;
Prostheses and implants
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2010;30(9):832-836
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the indications of cervical artificial disc replacement (ADR) based on radiographic evaluation and different anterior decompression methods. Methods From January 2008 to July 2009, 175 patients with cervical spondylosis or disc herniation who underwent anterior decompression were involved in this study. Patients were distributed to different operative groups based on the preoperative radiographic evaluation. One hundred and forty-five cases were treated with fusion operation, and the others received ADR. Operative methods were as follows: 1) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF); 2)Anterior cervical discectomy and subtotal vertebrectomy; 3) Anterior subtotal vertebreetomy and fusion; 4)ProDisc-C ADR. The patients with single-level of cervical spondylotic myelopathy were divided into ACDF and ADR groups according to different operative methods. Clinical outcomes of two groups were evaluated by Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. The range of motion (ROM) of the segment was recorded in ADR group at the 1st month, 3rd month, 6th month and 12th month postoperatively. Results The indication of ADR was cervical spondylosis with slight disc calcification or small vertebral posterior osteophytes. Under this condition, decompression could be obtained thorough intervertebral space and ADR be implanted. If cervical spondylosis was associated with vertebral posterior huge osteophytes, serious intervertebral narrow or fusion, serious disc calcification ,ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and extensive cervical spinal stenosis, subtotal vertebrectomy was necessary. The mean improvement rates of ACDF and ADR were 66.05% and 67.13%. There was no difference between two groups (P ＞ 0.05). No difference of ROM was found before and after surgery in ADR group (P ＞0.05). Conclusion Only decompression can be achieved thorough through the intervertebral space, and ADR is suitable for cervical spondylosis. ACDF and ADR have similar outcomes in treatment of single-level of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. But ADR has the advantage of maintaining ROM of the operative segment.
