Comparison of the efficacy of XELOX and FOLFOX4 in the treatment of locally advanced unresectable gastric cancer
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2010.06.010
- VernacularTitle:XELOX和FOLFOX4新辅助化疗方案对不能手术切除的局部进展期胃癌的疗效比较
- Author:
Changqing JING
;
Leping LI
;
Jinshen WANG
;
Shuai KONG
;
Kailei WANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Gastric neoplasms;
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy;
Efficacy;
Cell proliferation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery
2010;09(6):430-433
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the efficacy of XELOX and FOLFOX4 in the treatment of locally advanced unresectable gastric cancer. Methods The clinical data of 72 patients with gastric cancer who were admitted to the Shandong Provincial Hospital from July 2006 to October 2009 were prospectively analyzed. Of all the patients, 3 lost follow-up, and 69 patients with locally advanced unresectable gastric cancer were randomly divided into XELOX group ( n = 36 ) and FOLFOX4 group ( n = 33 ) according to the random number table.All patients received chemotherapy for six weeks. The efficacy of the two regimens were evaluated by the multidiscipline team six weeks later. The cell cycle of patients with complete or partial remission and received surgical treatment was detected by flow cytometry. All data were analyzed using the Pearson chi-square test, Levene test or t test. Results The curative rates of XELOX and FOLFOX4 were 53% (19/36) and 52% (17/33), respectively,with no significant difference between the two groups ( x2= 0. 01 , P ＞ 0. 05 ). The incidences of nausea and vomiting, phlebitis and hand-foot syndrome were 25% (9/36), 6% (2/36) and 19% (7/36) in the xELOX group, and 55% ( 18/33), 39% (13/33) and 3% (1/33) in the FOLFOX4 group, respectively, with significant difference between the two groups ( x2 = 6.31, 11.59, 4.53, P ＜ 0.05 ). Nineteen patients in the XELOX group and 17 patients in the FOLFOX4 group received surgical resection of the gastric cancer, and no complications such as anastomotic leakage and hemorrhage occurred postoperatively. In the XELOX group, the s-phase fraction (SPF),proliferation index (PI) and G2/M of the gastric cancer cells were 5.89% ± 0.79%, 9.22% ± 1.99% and 5.19% ± 1. 66% after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which were significantly lower than 6.76% ± 1.21%, 10.44% ±2.12% and 6. 04% ± 0. 57% before neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while the ratio of gastric cancer cells in the G0/G1 phase after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 90.39% ±4.78%, which was significantly higher than 87.54%±6.34% before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (x2 =3.61, 2.52, 2. 15, 2.91, P ＜0.05). In the FOLFOX4group, the SPF, PI and G2/M of the gastric cancer cells were 6.09% ± 0.96%, 10.65 % ± 2.47% and 4.88% ±0.87% after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which were significantly lower than 7.15% ± 1.45%, 11.87% ± 2.33%and 5.67% ± 1.03% before neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while the ratio of gastric cancer cells in the G0/G1 phase after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 91.45% ± 5.22%, which was significantly higher than 88.01% ± 4.23%before neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( x2 = 3.50, 2.06, 3.37, 2.94, P ＜ 0.05 ). There was a significant difference in PI between XELOX group and FOLFOX4 group after neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( x2 = 2.66, P ＜ 0.05 ).Conclusions XELOX and FOLFOX4 are safe and effective in the treatment of locally advanced unresectable gastric cancer, and they can significantly restrain the proliferation of gastric cancer cells. XELOX regimen is more effective than FOLFOX4 regimen.
