Comparative study of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and color Doppler flow imaging in quantitative evaluation of chronic kidney dysfunction
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2011.01.010
- VernacularTitle:超声造影定量分析与彩色多普勒血流显像评价慢性肾功能不全患者肾功能状态的对比研究
- Author:
Yi DONG
;
Weimin CHEN
;
Wenping WANG
;
Jiayin CAO
;
Peili FAN
;
Xiyuan LIN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Ultrasonography;
Microbubbles;
Renal insufficiency,chronic
- From:
Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
2011;20(1):30-33
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in quantitative diagnosis of chronic kidney dysfunction(CKD) by comparing it with color Doppler imaging (CDFI). Methods Tirty-three cases (15 males and 18 females) of clinical confirmed CKD (stage Ⅲ～Ⅴ)were included. Forty-five healthy volunteers were performed as control group. CEUS and CDFI were performed on each patient. After intravenous bolus injection of 1ml SonoVue each side,CEUS of renal cortex blood perfusion was collected successively,and a time-intensity curve(TIC) was created with Philips iU22 system's QLAB software. Resistance index(RI) and peak systolic velocity(PSV) of renal partial arteries were also tested. Results Compared with normal kidney,CKD patients had delayed perfusion and decreased intensity. Changes of area under curve(AUC), derived peak intensity(DPI), slope rate of ascending curve(A)and time to peak(TTP) were statistically significant ( P ＜0. 05). Sensitivities of AUC,DPI,A and TTP in diagnosis of CKD (stage Ⅲ～Ⅴ ) were 91.2% ,84. 9% ,90.9% and 85.3%, their specificities were 95.4%,88.9% ,93.3% and 90.9%, their accuracies were 93.6%, 87. 2%, 92.3% and 88. 5%, respectively. The results of CEUS were better than RI in CDFI (sensitivity 70.4%, specificity 37. 8%, accuracy 52.2%).Conclusions CEUS can precisely display the hemodynamic change in CKD ( stage Ⅲ～Ⅴ ), and is more sensitive than CDFI.
