Bracing treatment for girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: clinical outcomes and predictive factors
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2011.03.001
- VernacularTitle:女性青少年特发性脊柱侧凸支具治疗效果和影响因素评估
- Author:
Xu SUN
;
Bin WANG
;
Yong QIU
;
Zezhang ZHU
;
Feng ZHU
;
Yang YU
;
Bangping QIAN
;
Weiwei MA
;
Zhen LIU
;
Saihu MAO
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Female;
Adolescent;
Scoliosis;
Orthopedic equipment
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2011;31(3):201-206
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the outcomes of bracing treatment for girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and to investigate the predictive factors of the protocol. Methods This study included 142 girls with AIS who finished standardized bracing treatment from July 2003 to July 2009. These patients had a mean age of 13.1±1.5 years, a mean main curve of 29.6°±5.4°, and a mean Risser grade of 2.0±1.5 before bracing treatment. Curve progression was defined that Cobb angle was greater than 6° compared to bracing initiation or was aggravated to more than 45° (indicative for surgery). The outcomes of bracing treatment were assessed based on the ratio of curves of progression or indicative for surgery. Chi-square and Logistic regression Analyses were performed to investigate the predictive factors of bracing treatment. Results The duration of bracing treatment averaged 2.5±1.0 years. Twenty-seven girls with curve progression (19%)and 115 girls (81%) with non-progression were found. Final curve which was greater than 45° was found in 18 girls (13%) who need a correction surgery, the remaining 124 girls (87%) had completed bracing treatment and avoided surgery. Chi-square analyses revealed that curve progression were more common in younger girls with lower Risser grade, with initial larger Cobb angle and with a main thoracic curve pattern.Logistic regression analyses found that premenarchal status and a main thoracic curve pattern were the independent risk factors of curve progression despite bracing. While initial Cobb angle which was greater than 30° was the additional independent risk factor of progression requiring surgery. Conclusion Bracing treatment could effectively prevent curve progression in most girls with AIS. The degree of growth maturity, the pattern and grade of curve are the influencing factor for bracing treatment.
