Clinicopathological comparison among atypical membranous nephropathy with serum antinuclear antibody positivity, lupus membranous nephropathy and idiopathic membranous nephropathy
- VernacularTitle:血清抗核抗体阳性的不典型膜性肾病与狼疮膜性肾病及特发性膜性肾病的临床病理比较
- Author:
Chao LI
;
Hang LI
;
Yubing WEN
;
Xuewang LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Antibodies,antinuclear;
Glomerulonephritis,membranous;
Immunoglobalin G;
Atypical membranous nephropathy;
Lupus membranous nephropathy;
Idiopathic membranous nephropathy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Nephrology
2008;24(6):398-404
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objectives To study the relationship of atypical membranous nephropathy (AMN) with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) and lupus membranous nephropathy (LMN), and to explore the predictive clinical and pathological features for LMN diagnosis. Methods The patients undergone renal biopsy in PUMCH between 2003 and 2006 were selected, and were divided into group AMN (n=28), IMN (n=100) and LMN (n=45). Clinical manifestations and pathological features were compared among three groups retrospectively. The intensity of glomerular IgG subclasses was analyzed by immunohistoehemical staining among three groups semi- quantitatively. The spatial arrangement of IgG and C3 deposits was investigated by immunofluorescenee double staining among three groups by eonfocal laser scanning microscopy. Results (1) The onset age of AMN was (38±17) years and female/male ratio(F/M) was 2.5:1 in group LMN and IMN. The onset age was significantly different among three groups (P<0.01), and F/M ratio was significantly different between AMN and IMN (P=0.017). (2) The incidence of most extra-renal manifestations was less than 20% in AMN except for hematological disorder (21.4%) and serum anti-SSA antibody positivity(40.7%). (3) The incidence of subendothelial electron densedeposits in either LMN or AMN was significantly higher than that in IMN (P<0.01). (4) The percentage of IgG3 predominance in AMN and LMN giomeruli was 78.9% and 73.9%, respectively, while the percentage of IgC,-4 predominance in IMN was 61.1%. The difference was significant(IMN vs AMN and LMN, P<0.01). (5) IMN had an overlapping distribution of IgG and C3 in subepithelial deposition, which was rarely found in AMN or LMN. (6) Among the indexes differentiating LMN and IMN, the high sensitive one was non-IgC,4 predominance in glomeruli (91.3%), while the high specific ones included subendothelial electron dense deposits (100.0%), serum anti-SSA antibody (95.5%), glomendar IgG3 predominance (94.4%). Conclusions AMN with serum ANA positivity is similar to LMN in respect to pathological features and glomerular IgG subclasses, although it has few extra-renal clinical manifestations. It may represent a latent subgroup of lupus nephritis.
