How to Write Abstractor's Comments on Structured Abstract of RCT in Kampo
10.3937/kampomed.60.177
- Author:
Koki TSURUOKA
;
Tetsuro OKABE
;
Kiichiro TSUTANI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
evidence based medicine (EBM);
evidence report;
randomized controlled trial (RCT);
structured abstract;
feedback
- MeSH:
Medicine, Kampo;
seconds;
Educational workshop;
Special C;
Reporting
- From:Kampo Medicine
2009;60(2):177-184
- CountryJapan
- Language:Japanese
-
Abstract:
The Japan Society for Oriental Medicine (JSOM) began its second Special Committee for EBM (evidence- based medicine) project in 2005. Evidence Report Task Force (ER-TF) of the furthered the project on Evidence Reporting in Kampo Treatment initiated by the previous committee in 2001. The second Committee once again collected randomized control trial (RCT) literature only, to produce structured abstracts (SA). ors were then asked to make comments in these SA, as would be found in international EBM medical journals. There was concern, however, that their comments were reviewed negatively by authors of original article. Therefore a workshop entitled “How to Write Appropriate Comments” was held at the 58th Annual Meeting of JSOM in Hiroshima, on June 17, 2007. This workshop proved educational, and demonstrated ways to write more positive comments, including the so-called “sandwich technique” of writing first positive, then negative, then positive comments (PNP).
