Differences in cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses between body mass-based squat and lunge exercises with relation to muscular activity with relation to muscular activity level
- VernacularTitle:筋活動水準との関連でみた自体重負荷でのスクワットとフロントランジにおける呼吸循環および代謝応答の違い
- Author:
Miki Haramura
;
Yohei Takai
;
Masayoshi Yamamoto
;
Hiroaki Kanehisa
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: resistance exercise; physiological load; oxygen uptake; heart rate; electromyograms
- From:Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine 2017;66(1):101-110
- CountryJapan
- Language:Japanese
-
Abstract:
This study aimed to clarify the differences in cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses to body mass-based front lunge and squat exercises with relation to muscular activity. Seven healthy adult males performed 200 times body mass-based squat and front lunge exercises. During the exercises, oxygen uptake, heart rate (HR), blood lactate concentration (La), ground reaction force were measured. Oxygen uptake was divided by body mass (VO2). VO2 and HR was normalized to maximal VO2 (%VO2max) and maximal HR (%HRmax) obtained from an incremental load test. Electromyograms (EMGs) during the two exercises were recorded from the vastus lateralis (VL), rectus femoris, vastus medialis (VM), biceps femoris, gluteus maximus (GM). EMG amplitudes during both exercises were normalized to those during maximal voluntary contraction, and expressed as relative value (%EMGMVC). Time that cardiorespiratory parameters became stable was 4-6 min in both exercises. VO2, %VO2max, metabolic equivalent, were higher in the front lunge than the squat. No significant differences in HR, %HRmax and La were found between both tasks. %EMGMVC in VL, VM and GM were higher in the front lunge than the squat. These current findings indicate that 1) body mass-based squat and front lunge exercises are physiologically of more than moderate intensity, and 2) the cardiorespiratory responses to body mass-based front lunge are greater than those to body mass-based squat. This may be due to the difference in muscular activities of VL, VM and GM during the tasks.