Optimal Cutoffs of Cardiometabolic Risk for Postmenopausal Korean Women.
10.1016/j.anr.2017.05.003
- Author:
Hye Ryoung KIM
1
;
Hee Seung KIM
Author Information
1. College of Nursing, Shinhan University, Dongducheon-si, South Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
abdominal obesity;
menopause;
waist circumference;
waist-to-hip ratio
- MeSH:
Female;
Humans;
Lipoproteins;
Menopause;
Obesity;
Obesity, Abdominal;
Sensitivity and Specificity;
Triglycerides;
Waist Circumference;
Waist-Hip Ratio
- From:Asian Nursing Research
2017;11(2):107-112
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to identify the optimal cutoff values of indices for cardiometabolic risk in postmenopausal Korean women. Specifically, we intended to determine the cutoffs of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), serum lipid profile, and homeostatic model of assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) for detecting metabolic syndrome (MetS), and metabolic obesity (MO). METHODS: The study participants were 397 postmenopausal women. We defined MetS and MO with the International Diabetes Federation criteria except for waist circumference. A receive operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the accuracy of diagnostic indices for identifying MetS and MO. Cutoff values were obtained both from the point on the receive operating characteristic curve which was closest to (0,1) and from the Youden's index. RESULTS: Among the participants, 34.5% and 73% were classified as having MetS and MO. The optimal cutoff of waist circumference and WHR were 81.9 cm [area under curve (AUC): 0.687, sensitivity: 61.7%, specificity: 68.9%], 0.87 (AUC: 0.660, sensitivity: 64.7%, Specificity: 60.2%) for MetS and 77.4 cm (AUC: 0.655, sensitivity: 65.6%, specificity: 57.8%), 0.86 (AUC: 0.680, sensitivity: 67.0%, specificity: 62.7%) for MO. Triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein ratio for MetS and MO were 2.11 (AUC: 0.838, sensitivity: 71.5%, specificity: 79.6%) and 1.59 (AUC: 0.725, sensitivity: 65.9%, specificity: 68.2%) respectively. The HOMA-IR for MetS was 1.36 (AUC: 0.773, sensitivity: 73%, specificity: 71.9%) and for MO was 1.17 (AUC: 0.713, sensitivity: 64.5%, specificity: 69.2%). CONCLUSIONS: For postmenopausal women, we suggest waist circumference of 81.9 cm and WHR of 0.87 as criteria of MetS. However, women with waist circumference over 77.4 cm and WHR over 0.86 should be monitored for the future development of MetS.
