A questionnaire survey on the ethics education in medical representatives’ continuing education in Japan
10.11256/jjdi.12.61
- VernacularTitle:医薬情報担当者（MR）の継続教育における倫理教育に関する現状調査
- Author:
Akiko Nakada
;
Misao Fujita
;
Satoshi Kodama
;
Hiromichi Ooya
;
Yoshifumi Mizuno
;
Akira Akabayashi
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
medical representatives;
continuing education;
ethics education;
questionnaire survey
- From:Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics
2010;12(2):61-68
- CountryJapan
- Language:Japanese
-
Abstract:
Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the content and methods of ethics education for medical representatives as part of the continuing education program and to suggest a preferable supportive method of ethics education accordingly.
Method: A questionnaire was mailed to the medical representative education managers of all 214 companies, all members of the MR Education & Accreditation Center, Japan. The questionnaire was carried out from 31st July 2009 to 25th August 2009, and data from this questionnaire survey was analyzed by simple and cross tables.
Results: Out of the 182 (response rate: 85.0%) who responded, we analyzed the 173 institutions for analysis as they responded as having the continuing education program. In terms of education, “the fair competition code” was the most widely educated (82.6%). Although “the fair competition code” required most time, “the ethics as a medical representative” was considered as the most important. The simple kappa coefficient between actual educating item and important item was 0.29. Answers were affected by whether he/she had experience as a medical representative. As the method of ethics education, “lecture” style was most common (87.4% of respondents), “group work discussion” was considered the most effective (70.6%) for training a medical representative to think and learn by himself/herself. The respondents of 82.2% referred to the continuing educations’ guidelines made by MR Education & Accreditation Center, and 81.0% respondents felt “training materials for lectures and/or discussions” necessary in the future.
Conclusion: The ethics education for medical representatives placed a disproportionate emphasis on the importance of “the fair competition code.” Dissociation was seen between the actual education and the education considered as important by the respondents. Accordingly, there is a need for appropriate materials for training and for a more adequate curriculum, taking time and content of education into consideration, especially for contents which training ways aren’t built up.
