Comparison of reasons for hospital visits before and after name change of outpatient service from “internal medicine” to “general practice”
10.14442/generalist.33.238
- VernacularTitle:内科外来のうち「初診・予約外外来」を「総合診療外来」へ改称した前後での受診理由の変化
- Author:
Satoko Kurosawa
;
Masato Matsushima
;
Yasuhiko Miura
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
reasons for hospital visits;
general practice;
primary care
- From:An Official Journal of the Japan Primary Care Association
2010;33(3):238-245
- CountryJapan
- Language:Japanese
-
Abstract:
Objective
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the differences in the reasons for visits to a Tokyo hospital before and after the changing of the name of the outpatient service from “internal medicine” to “general practice.”
Methods
The participants in this study were outpatients who visited the internal medicine department from September to October, 2006, and the general practice department from September to October in 2008, for their first medical examination at a hospital in Tokyo.
We encoded the reasons for the hospital visits using ICPC-2 (International Classification of Primary Care-2), and counted the number of reasons for each outpatient.
Results
In the internal medicine service, there were 362 outpatients participants (193 men and 169 women) with an average age of 48.6 years. In the general practice service, the participants consisted of 376 outpatients (206 men and 170 women) with an average age of 50.5 years. The difference between the total number of reasons for visits to the general practice service (1.7 ± 0.9 per visit) and to the internal medicine service (1.5 ± 0.8 per visit) was statistically significant. However, no significant differences were found between the two in terms of the proportion of the frequency for each category of reasons.
Conclusion
This study found that the changing of the name of the outpatient service from “internal medicine” to “general practice” led to a slight but statistically significant increase in the total number of reasons per visit. However, this change had no effect on the frequency for each category of reasons as a proportion of the total.
