The Impact of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery on Morbidly Obese Patients with Type 2 DM.
- Author:
Hongchan LEE
1
;
Mikyoung KIM
;
Hyuksang KWON
;
Kiho SONG
;
Eungkook KIM
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB); Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB); Improvement of type 2 diabetes mellitus
- MeSH: Bariatric Surgery; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Follow-Up Studies; Gastric Bypass; Hemoglobins; Humans; Insulin; Korea; Retrospective Studies; Weight Loss
- From:Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 2010;79(1):8-13
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
- Abstract: PURPOSE: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) are the most effective intervention and cure in achieving sustained weight loss in the morbidly obese with co-morbities, especially in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Currently, there are few data in the literature presenting early diabetic outcomes between the 2 major bariatric surgeries in Korea. The aim of this study is to observe weight loss, improvement of type 2 DM after LRYGB and LAGB. METHODS: 33 retrospective data were obtained from diabetic subjects undergoing LRYGB (n=53) and LAGB (n=77). These measurements included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), pre-operative diabetic duration, post-operative diabetic at follow-up visit after surgery. Paired t-test, and SPSS12.0 were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: 33 morbidly obese patients with type 2 DM who had both procedures complain of general weakness. Most patients were taking oral medications or insulin and tired of them. Pre and post-op 12 months of percent of excess weight loss (%EWL), fetal bovine serum (FBS), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) presented at 0%, 185.6 mg/dl, 8.7% and 70.6%, 123.4 mg/dl, 6.6% in patients who had LRYGB (P<0.05). Pre and post-op 12 months of %EWL, FBS, HbA1C presented at 0%, 180.6 mg/dl, 8.4% and 32.8%, 136.5 mg/dl, 6.8% in patients who had LAGB (P<0.05). Rate of discontinuance or decreasing for treatment of type 2 DM after surgery showed 94% for LRYGB versus 80% for LAGB, and unchanged rates were 6% versus 20%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study showed LRYGB and LAGB are quite satisfactory and promising bariatric procedures with significant weight loss and improvement of type 2 DM in Koreans. LRYGB is significantly associated with more weight loss, more diabetic outcome than LAGB. Clinical experiences in Korea with both procedures are limited and a larger number of cases are need, but the recent data shows promising results that are comparable to the international experience.
