Surgical Results of Valvular Disease in Hemodialysis Patients
10.4326/jjcvs.42.371
- VernacularTitle:慢性透析患者に対する弁膜症手術成績
- Author:
Hiroyuki Saisho
;
Koichi Arinaga
;
Takahiro Shojima
;
Yuichiro Hirata
;
Takanori Kono
;
Koji Akasu
;
Tomokazu Kosuga
;
Hiroshi Tomoeda
;
Hidetoshi Akashi
;
Hiroyuki Tanaka
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
valvular disease;
hemodialysis;
prosthetic valve
- From:Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
2013;42(5):371-376
- CountryJapan
- Language:Japanese
-
Abstract:
Background : The Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy in 2011 reports that the number of hemodialysis patients has been increasing and that there is an increase in long-term hemodialysis patients and the aging of hemodialysis induction. Therefore, it can be expected that the number of valve surgeries in chronic hemodialysis patients will increase. However, there are many problems between chronic hemodialysis and valve surgery. Objectives : To describe the results of valve surgery in chronic hemodialysis patients at our institution and evaluate the selection of prosthetic valve and associated problems. Methods : Between January 2001 and June 2011, a total of 29 patients on chronic hemodialysis including 3 patients for re-operation, underwent valve replacements. The average age was 67.3±9.3 years and 17 (65%) were men. The average dialysis duration was 7.9±6.4 years. The etiologies of renal failure were 8 for chronic glomerulonephritis (31%), 8 for nephrosclerosis (31%) and 3 for diabetic nephropathy (12%). Results : There were 2 (7.7%) in-hospital deaths, which resulted from ischemia of intestine and multiple organ failure due to heart failure. Twelve (46%) patients died during the follow-up period and the 5-year survival rate after surgery was as poor as another authors have reported previously (30.6%). However, the 5-year survival rate after hemodialysis introduction was 87.1%, which was better than the report of the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy in 2011 (60%). Average age was significantly higher in bioprosthetic valves than in mechanical valves (p=0.02). There was no significant difference in survival rate among mechanical and bioprosthetic valves (p=0.75). There was no significant difference in valve-related complication free rate among mechanical (27.5%) and bioprosthetic valves (23.4%) (p=0.9). Three patients with mechanical valves had cerebral hemorrhage, and 1 patient with bioprosthetic valve had structural valve deterioration. Conclusions : Surgical result of valvular disease in hemodialysis patients was as poor as another authors reported previously (5-year survival rate : 30.6%), but survival rate after hemodialysis introduction was not very poor (87.1%). There was no significant difference in survival rate among mechanical and bioprosthetic valves. Bioprosthetic valve has the risk of reoperation due to early structural valve deterioration, but there was no significant difference in valve-related complication free rates. Therefore, we should select prosthetic valve in consideration of individual cases.
