Reoperation following Aortic Valve Replacement Using Tilting Disc Valve Prostheses.
10.4326/jjcvs.25.230
- VernacularTitle:傾斜円板弁による大動脈弁置換術後の再手術例の検討
- Author:
Yoshihiko Kurimoto
;
Teruhisa Kazui
;
Masanori Nakamura
;
Nobuyuki Takagi
;
Kiyofumi Morishita
;
Toshiaki Tanaka
;
Sakuzo Komatsu
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- From:Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
1996;25(4):230-234
- CountryJapan
- Language:Japanese
-
Abstract:
Fifty-three patients who had received aortic valve replacement (AVR) using tilting disc valve prostheses (Lillehei-Kaster valve, Omniscience valve, Omnicarbon valve), underwent replacement of their aortic valve prostheses over the past 13 years. The indications for reoperation were non-structural opening failure in 35 patients, thrombosed valves, including 2 stuck valves in 8, prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) in 7 and perivalvular leakage (PVL) in 3. The interval periods until reoperation for opening failure and thrombosed valve were 112 and 118 months respectively, and for PVE and PVL were 21 and 25 months. There were 7 hospital deaths (13.2%). Surgical results in cases of active PVE with root abscess and stuck valve required emergency operation were significantly worse than these for nonstructural opening failure. Opening failures, which accounted for two-thirds of the indications for reoperation was found to be due to subvalvular pannus formation on minor orifices which hindered the disc from opening properly. It was suggested that reoperation for these types of prosthetic valve should be done before they develop into emergency cases, taking account of these valve-related complications.
