Evaluation of mid-term follow-up after Salter innominate osteotomy in developmental dysplasia of the hip.
- Author:
Tian-Jing LIU
1
;
Yong-Yan SHI
;
Shi-Nong PAN
;
Zhen-Jiang LIU
;
Qun ZHAO
;
Li-Jun ZHANG
;
Shi-Jun JI
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Acetabulum; surgery; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hip Dislocation, Congenital; surgery; Humans; Infant; Male; Osteotomy; methods; Pelvic Bones; surgery; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
- From: Chinese Journal of Surgery 2010;48(15):1149-1153
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVESTo evaluate the mid-term outcome after Salter innominate osteotomy in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), and to observe the developmental characteristics of the hip after operation and the relationships between the mid-term outcome and radiographic parameters as well as age at operation.
METHODS: Forty-four patients with 61 treated hips were selected. The patients were treated with Salter innominate osteotomy and followed-up for at least three years with intact serial radiographs. Radiographs taken before operation, 6 weeks, 1 year and 2 - 3 years after operation and in the latest follow-up were selected. Acetabular index (AI), Sharp acetabular angle (SAA) and center-edge angle of Wiberg (CEA) were measured and Severin classification was done according to radiographs taken in the latest follow-up.
RESULTSThe average correction of AI was 14° postoperatively. The acetabulum remodels best at 2-3 years after operation when the average AI became very close to normal. In the latest follow-up the SAA was 41° which could be regarded as normal. Postoperative CEA was on average 23° which increased to 25° 2-3 years later. In the latest follow-up, the average CEA was 26°. The ratio of excellent and good outcomes (Severin I, II) was 84%, while the ratio of moderate and poor outcomes (Severin III, IV, V, VI) was 16%. Age at operation had a negative effect on outcomes. Although 70% patients operated after age 6 had satisfactory outcomes. The Severin I, II group showed no difference in AI from III, IV, V, VI group 6 weeks after operation, but the AI of the former obviously improved 2-3 years after operation while that of the latter deteriorated. Significant difference in SAA and the CEA could be observed in the latest follow-up.
CONCLUSIONSSalter innominate osteotomy focuses on normalizing the abnormal acetabular direction in DDH children as well as stimulating the remodeling of the acetabulum, which provides a satisfactory middle-term outcome. The acetabulum remodels rapidly during the first three years after operation when AI and CEA develops into normal. Interference should be adopted if these changes have not appeared in the first three years.