Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Combined Chemotherapy with PEG-Asp for Treatment of ALL and T-NHL Patients.
- Author:
Yan XU
1
;
Jin WANG
1
;
Nan YANG
1
;
Ju BAI
1
;
Peng-Yu ZHANG
1
;
Liu-Fang GU
1
;
Bo LEI
1
;
Jie LIU
1
;
Fang-Xia WANG
1
;
Bing-Qiao HUANG
1
;
Wang-Gang ZHANG
1
;
Ai-Li HE
1
;
Xing-Mei CAO
1
;
Yin-Xia CHEN
1
;
Xiao-Rong MA
2
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; therapeutic use; Asparaginase; therapeutic use; Humans; Lymphoma, T-Cell; drug therapy; Polyethylene Glycols; therapeutic use; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma; drug therapy; Survival Rate
- From: Journal of Experimental Hematology 2016;24(2):405-410
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo explore the effectiveness and safety of combined chemotherapy with pegasparaginase (PEG-Asp) for treatment of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and T cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (T-NHL) patients.
METHODSA total of 62 ALL or T-NHL patients were diagnosed and treated in our department and were enrolled in this study. Among them, 22 patients received the combined chemotherapy with PEG-Asp, while the other 40 patients received the standard chemotherapy with L-asparaginase (L-Asp) as the control. Therapeutic effectiveness, adverse effects, duration and expense of hospitalization, treatment-related mortality and survival were evaluated and compared in 2 different groups.
RESULTSIn group of combined chemotherapy with PEG-Asp, the overall response rate was 90.91% (20 cases), among them CR rate and PR rate are 77.27% (17 cases) and 13.64% (3 cases), respectively. In the group of standard chemotherapy with L-Asp, the overall response rate was 87.5% (35 cases), among them CR rate and PR rate were 72.5% (29 cases) and 15% (6 cases), respectively. The difference neither between PEG-Asp and L-Asp chemotherapy groups nor between ALL and T-NHL subgroups was significant (P > 0.05). The 6-month and 12-month overall survival rates were not significantly different between the PEG-Asp and L-Asp chemotherapy groups, respectively (P > 0.05). The adverse effects were identified as degree 1-2 according to the WHO criteria of drug toxicity. Neither the adverse effects identified as degree 3-4 nor the treatment-related death were observed. Expect for allergy and hyperglycaemia, the difference of side-effect incidence between the two groups were not significant (P > 0.05). The treatment for all the patients in PEG-Asp chemotherapy group was completed, while the treatment with L-Asp was completed only in 29 cases. Moreover, both average duration and expense of hospitalization after the combined chemotherapy were less than the control.
CONCLUSIONWith higher response rate, lower drug toxicity and allergy incidence, the combined chemotherapy with PEG-Asp can replace the standard chemotherapy with L-Asp in the treatment of ALL and T-NHL. The optimization of the combined chemotheropeutic protocols for more cases and long-term survival rates need to further and deeply explorate.