Observation of topography and analysis of surface contamination of titanium implant after roughness treatment.
- Author:
Hongdan CAO
1
;
Xiaodong YANG
;
Dayi WU
;
Xingdong ZHANG
Author Information
1. Engineering Research Center in Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Dental Implants;
Dental Materials;
chemistry;
Dental Prosthesis Design;
Humans;
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning;
Surface Properties;
Titanium;
chemistry
- From:
Journal of Biomedical Engineering
2007;24(2):372-375
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
The roughness treatment of dental implant surface could improve the bone bonding and increase the success rate of implant, but the difference of diverse treatments is still unknown. In this study using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy disperse spectrometer (EDS) and the test of contact angle, we studied the microstructure, surface contamination and surface energy, and hence conducted a comparative analysis of the following surface roughness treatments: Polished Treatment (PT), Sandblasting with Alumina(SA), Sandblasting with Aluminia and Acid-etched (SAA), Sandblasting with Titanium Acid-etched (STA), Electro-erosion Treatment(ET). The result of SEM showed that the surface displayed irregularities after roughness treatments and that the surface properties of different roughness treatments had some distinctions. SAA and SA had some sharp edges and protrutions; the STA showed a regular pattern like honeycomb, but the ET sample treated by electric erosion exhibited the deeper pores of different sizes and the pores with a perforated secondary structure. The EDS indicated that the surface was contaminated after the treatment with foreign materials; the SA surface had some embedded contaminations even after acid etching. The measurement of water contact angle indicated that the morphology correlated with the surface treatments. These findings suggest that the distinction of surface structure and composition caused by different treatments may result in the disparity in biological behavior of dental implant.
