Expression of IRP2 mRNA, TfR mRNA and Fn mRNA in HL-60 cells.
- Author:
Yu-Feng LIU
1
;
Chuan-Xin ZHANG
;
Li ZENG
Author Information
1. Department of Pediatric, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, China. lyf6012@163.net
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Ferritins;
genetics;
Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic;
HL-60 Cells;
Humans;
Iron Regulatory Protein 2;
genetics;
RNA, Messenger;
genetics;
metabolism;
Receptors, Transferrin;
genetics;
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
- From:
Journal of Experimental Hematology
2005;13(4):584-588
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
To explore the mechanism of iron metabolism and its regulation as well as the roles of IRP(2) in ion metabolism of HL-60 cells, HL-60 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, which was treated with ferric chloride (FeCl(3)) or deferoxamine (DFO). The cells were harvested at 12, 24 and 48 hours of proliferation, and total RNA was isolated; cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription (RT), and relative expression levels of IRP(2) mRNA, Fn mRNA and TfR mRNA were determined by RT-PCR. The results showed at follows: (1) the level of IRP(2) mRNA remained constant in all cells, whether or not treated with DFO or FeCl(3). However, the expression of IRP(2) mRNA decreased when the time of cell culture was prolonged. There was no significant difference between groups (F(B-S) = 1.199, P > 0.05), but there was significant difference among the different time culture (F(W-S) = 43.418, P < 0.01). (2) Cells which treated neither with DFO nor ferri chloride showed significant difference from the control (F(W-S) = 7.184, F(B-S) = 113.926; P < 0.01). The level of TfR mRNA increased in the cells treated with DFO. Surprisingly, when cells treated with FeCl(3), there was not decline of TfR mRNA expression, but it increased lightly at 12 hours and peaked at 24 hours and declined drastically at 48 hours. (3) The level of Fn mRNA in the cells treated with FeCl(3) was approximately 2-fold as the control cells. In contrast with the control cells, there was significant difference (P < 0.05). The level of Fn mRNA of the cells treated with DFO had little change. As compared with the control cells, no significant difference was seen (P > 0.05). (4) There was not any significant correlation between IRP(2) mRNA and TfR mRNA or Fn mRNA in HL-60 cells (r = -0.005; r = 0.074; P > 0.05). It is concluded that (1) IRP(2) may regulate the iron metabolism in HL-60 cells by altering amounts of the IRP(2) 3.7- or 6.4-kb mRNA at the transcriptional level, or by IRP(2) degradation at the post transcriptional level. (2) Both of Fn mRNA and TfR mRNA participated, more or less, in the iron metabolism in HL-60 cells.
