Efficacy of noninvasive ventilation on in-hospital mortality in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a meta-analysis.
- Author:
Tongwen SUN
1
;
Youdong WAN
;
Quancheng KAN
;
Fei YANG
;
Haimu YAO
;
Fangxia GUAN
;
Jinying ZHANG
;
Ling LI
2
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Acute Disease; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Noninvasive Ventilation; Pulmonary Edema; mortality; therapy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- From: Chinese Journal of Cardiology 2014;42(2):161-168
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy of noninvasive ventilation on in-hospital mortality in adult patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE) .
METHODSWe searched PubMed, Embase, Wanfang, CNKI data to find relevant randomized controlled trials of noninvasive ventilation for ACPE, which were reported from January 1980 to December 2012. Meta-analysis was performed with software of RevMan 5.1.
RESULTSAccording to inclusive criteria and exclusion criteria, 35 randomized controlled trials with 3 204 patients were enrolled for analyses. Meta-analysis of the trials showed that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) reduced in-hospital mortality by 43% (RR = 0.57, 95%CI 0.43-0.75, P < 0.01) and bilevel positive pressure ventilation (BiPAP) reduced mortality by 31% (RR = 0.69, 95%CI 0.51-0.94, P = 0.02) compared with standard therapy. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality between BiPAP and CPAP (RR = 1.09, 95%CI 0.80-1.49, P = 0.57) and myocardial infarction rate (BiPAP vs. CPAP: RR = 1.20, 95%CI 0.95-1.52, P = 0.12; BiPAP vs. standard therapy: RR = 1.10, 95%CI 0.88-1.38, P = 0.40).
CONCLUSIONNoninvasive ventilation (BiPAP and CPAP) could reduce in-hospital mortality of adult patients with ACPE, which could be used as first-line management strategies for these patients.