Quantitative evaluation of ischemic myocardium by adenosine tissue Doppler stress echocardiography..
- Author:
Yin-Guang SUN
1
;
Qin-Hua ZHAO
;
Ru-Min HE
;
Wei-Feng SHEN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adenosine; Diastole; Echocardiography, Doppler; Echocardiography, Stress; Humans; Myocardium
- From: Chinese Journal of Cardiology 2008;36(10):907-911
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the value of adenosine tissue Doppler stress echocardiography on ischemic myocardium.
METHODSRoutine dosage (140 microgxkg(-1)xmin(-1) IV for 6 min) adenosine stress echocardiography was performed on 40 patients with chest pain for diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). The images of left ventricular myocardial motion were acquired by tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) based on traditional 2D stress echocardiography before and 3 min, 6 min after adenosine stress (GE Vivid 7, USA). The myocardial velocity, strain and strain rate in 16 segments were offline measured and analyzed on ECHOPAC software. The results were compared with that of coronary angiography (CAG).
RESULTSCAG identified 18 CAD and 22 non-CAD patients with 159 ischemic segments and 465 non-ischemic segments. Adenosine significantly increased the systolic velocity (Sm), early diastolic velocity (Em), late diastolic velocity (Am), peak systolic strain (Smax), systolic strain rate (SRs), early diastolic strain rate (SRe) and late diastolic strain rate (SRa) both ischemic and non-ischemic segments (all P < 0.05). The baseline Sm and Em in ischemic segments were significant lower than non-ischemic segments [(3.16 +/- 1.20) cm/s vs (4.03 +/- 1.27) cm/s, P < 0.01; (3.75 +/- 1.67) cm/s vs (4.66 +/- 1.70) cm/s, P < 0.05]. At peak stress the differences in Sm and Em were more significant [(3.98 +/- 1.63) cm/s vs (5.07 +/- 1.52) cm/s; (4.51 +/- 2.32) cm/s vs (6.52 +/- 2.56) cm/s; P < 0.01]. The reductions on Smax and Se were more significant in ischemic segments compared those in non-ischemic segments (16.91% +/- 3.35% vs 19.56% +/- 5.47%, P < 0.01 and 9.53% +/- 2.89% vs 13.06% +/- 4.63%, P < 0.001). The biggest area under curve (AUC) in peak stress was seen in Se by ROC curve analysis (AUC = 0.740, with sensitivity 67% and specificity 83%).
CONCLUSIONParameters derived from TDI offer reliable and accurate information on ischemic myocardium during adenosine stress echocardiography.