National survey of doctor-reported secondary preventive treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome in China.
- Author:
Jing LI
1
;
Xi LI
;
Yi-Ping CHEN
;
Zheng-Ming CHEN
;
Li-Hua ZHANG
;
Fang FENG
;
Hai-Bo ZHANG
;
Jia-Min LIU
;
Yan GAO
;
Wuhan-Bilige HUNDEI
;
Li LI
;
Li-Xin JIANG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Acute Coronary Syndrome; prevention & control; China; Coronary Disease; prevention & control; Humans; Physicians; statistics & numerical data; Secondary Prevention; methods; Surveys and Questionnaires
- From: Chinese Medical Journal 2013;126(18):3451-3455
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUNDLong-term use of antiplatelet agents, statins, beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are proven therapies for secondary prevention in acute coronary syndrome. However, little is known of physicians' opinion about their use in China.
METHODSIn 2010, standard questionnaires were posted to chief cardiologists in 1397 geographically diverse and representative sample of tertiary and secondary hospitals in China, collecting information about their opinions on the recommended treatments for acute coronary syndrome.
RESULTSA total of 1009 (72%) cardiologists responded with a valid questionnaire. Of them, 77% reported routine use of all the four main secondary preventive treatments, with little difference between secondary and tertiary hospitals (75% vs. 79%, P = 0.16). Of the cardiologists reporting routine or selective use of aspirin, beta-blockers, statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, 94%, 85%, 73% and 86% would recommend indefinite use respectively. For all the 4 treatments combined, only 63.5% reported indefinite use at the same time, with no significant difference between secondary and tertiary hospitals (62% vs. 65%, P = 0.17), nor between hospitals with or without fast track for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (66% vs. 61%, P = 0.50).
CONCLUSIONSAlthough Chinese cardiologists seem well informed about the value of main secondary preventive treatments for acute coronary syndrome, there is still gap in their understanding of the need for combined and prolonged use of these treatments.