Alternatives to albumin administration in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing hepatectomy: an open, randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety.
- Author:
Jian YANG
1
;
Wen-Tao WANG
;
Lü-Nan YAN
;
Ming-Qing XU
;
Jia-Yin YANG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Albumins; therapeutic use; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; surgery; Female; Hemodynamics; Hepatectomy; methods; Humans; Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives; therapeutic use; Isotonic Solutions; therapeutic use; Liver Neoplasms; surgery; Male; Middle Aged; Young Adult
- From: Chinese Medical Journal 2011;124(10):1458-1464
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUNDThe value of artificial colloids in treating patients with liver disease is controversial. The effects of intravascular volume replacement regimens on liver function secondary to alteration of the postoperative inflammatory response are not known. In this study, we evaluated the effects of different volume replacement regimens in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing hepatectomy to clarify whether albumin administration can be replaced by other volume replacement products.
METHODSNinety consecutive hepatocellular carcinoma patients scheduled for hepatectomy were prospectively randomized to receive 20% human albumin (HA), 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES) or lactated Ringer's solution (LR) for postoperative volume replacement. Hemodynamic, liver function and inflammatory response parameters were recorded on postoperative days one, three, and five throughout the investigation period.
RESULTSSignificantly less volume was required in the HA and the HES groups. Although patients in all groups had similar baseline values, the plasma osmolality was significantly higher in the HA and HES groups. Total bilirubin (TB), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increased from baseline in all groups, and did not differ significantly between groups. C-reactive protein (CRP) was significantly lower in the HES group compared with the other groups.
CONCLUSIONSIn hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing hepatectomy, HA can be replaced by HES or LR in well selected patients. Hemodynamic stability, liver function, and postoperative clinical outcomes could be equivalently achieved in the HES group; also, HES may exert more favorable effects on the acute phase response.