OBJECTIVETo compare the difference in the clinical efficacy on anal pendant expansion after PPH (procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids) of mixed hemorrhoid between acupuncture at Xialiao (BL 34) and Chang-qiang (GV 1) and oral administration of diosmin.

METHODSSixty cases of mixed hemorrhoids after PPH were randomized into an observation group and a control group, 30 cases in each one. In the observation group, since the 1st day, acupuncture had been applied to Xialiao (BL 34) and Changqiang (GV 1). The needles were retained for 30 min afterarrival, and the treatment was given once a day, totally for 7 days. In the control group, diosmin tablets had been prescribed for oral administration since the 1st day, 0.9 g each time, twice a day, totally for 7 days. The degree, persistent time and the pain score of anal pendant expansion were compared on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 7th days after PPH between the two groups and the efficacy was evaluated.

RESULTSOn the 1st day after PPH, the diffe-rences in the scores of the degree and persistent time of anal pendant expansion were not significant statistically between the two groups (all>0.05), but the pain score in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (<0.05) and lower than that before treatment (<0.05). On the 2nd, 3rd and 7th days after PPH, the degree and persistent time of anal pendant expansion and pain score in the two groups were all lower than those before treatment (all<0.05). The results in the observation group were better than those in the control group (all<0.05). At the end of treatment (on the 7th day after PPH), the total effective rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group[90.0% (27/30) vs 83.3% (25/30),<0.05].

CONCLUSIONSAcupuncture at Xialiao (BL 34) and Changqiang (GV 1) achieves the superior efficacy on anal pendant expansion after PPH of mixed hemorrhoids as compared with diosmin tablets.