OBJECTIVETo compare the clinic outcomes of dynamic hip screw (DHS), intramedullary fixation (IF) and proximal femur locking plate (PF-LCP) in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly patients.

METHODSFrom July 2000 to August 2009, 165 old patients with intertrochanteric fractures were treated respectively by DHS, IF, PF-LCP. Fifty-eight patients were in DHS group including 30 males and 28 females with an average age of 71 years old; there were 30 cases of type II fracture of Jensen, 28 cases of type III fracture. Sixty-five patients were in IF group including 35 males and 30 females with an average age of 73 years old; there were 37 cases of type II fracture of Jensen, 28 cases of type III fracture. Forty-two patients were in PF-LCP group including 23 males and 19 females with an average age of 74 years old; there were 22 cases of type II fracture of Jensen,20 cases of type III fracture. The operative procedures,complications and therapeutic effects were compared among 3 groups.

RESULTSAll patients were followed up from 15 to 21 months (averaged 18.3 months). The incision length and the operation time of IF group were shorter than that of DHS and PF-LCP, but there were no significant difference between DHS group and PF-LCP group. The intraoperattive blood loss, rehabilitation and healing time of IF and PF-LCP were less or shorter than that of DHS group, but there were no significant difference between IF group and PF-LCP group. The functional recovery of IF group and PF-LCP were better than that of DHS group, there were significant difference among 3 groups. The complications of PF-LCP group was fewer than that of IF group and DHS group.

CONCLUSIONPF-LCP is the credible method for intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly patients, especially for severe comminuted fracture and osteoporosis, for it can reduce operation complications and benefit for fracture healing and hip functional recovery.