Clinical efficacy and relative factors of dendritic cell-based tumor vaccination for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Author:
Kun WU
1
;
Jun-Song MENG
;
Azhati BAIHETIYA
;
Yu-Jie WANG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Cancer Vaccines; adverse effects; immunology; therapeutic use; Dendritic Cells; immunology; Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; prevention & control; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- From: National Journal of Andrology 2013;19(6):545-550
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccines in the treatment of prostate cancer, and investigate the factors that influence the clinical benefit rate (CBR) of the vaccines.
METHODSBased on pre-determined search criteria, we searched the Medline database for randomized controlled trials on DC-based vaccines immunotherapy of prostate cancer. We systematically analyzed the identified studies using RevMan 5.0 and SPSS 17.0 softwares.
RESULTSTen randomized controlled trials involving 179 prostate cancer patients were identified and subjected to meta-analysis. The CBR of the DC vaccines for prostate cancer was 54.2% , and the objective response rate was 7.7%. Most adverse effects were local reactions at the injection site, fever and flu-like symptoms. The prostate cancer patients achieved cellular immune response (OR = 31.12, 95% CI = 5.52-175.6, P < 0.01) and reduction of log PSA slope (OR = 4.38, 95% CI = 1.17-16.35, P = 0.03) after administration of DC vaccines, which was positively correlated with CBR. The dose of DC vaccines had a significant correlation with CBR (OR = 5.98, 95% CI = 1.45-24.62, P = 0.01), but not the age of the patients (P = 0.53). Besides, density-enriched DCs achieved a higher CBR, while the route of administration had no effect on CBR.
CONCLUSIONDC-based vaccines are effective, safe and well-tolerated in the treatment of prostate cancer. DC-mediated cellular immune response has a significant effect on CBR and can be used as an important index for the assessment of vaccines. More multi-centered randomized controlled trials of higher quality and larger sample size are needed to provide more valid evidence.