Loss expression of active fragile sites genes associated with the severity of breast epithelial abnormalities.
- Author:
Tian-tian WANG
1
;
Eldo E FREZZA
;
Rong MA
;
San-yuan HU
;
Chong-zhong LIU
;
Guang-yong ZHANG
;
Mitchell S WACHTEL
;
Xiao-mei LÜ
;
Jin-bo FENG
;
Cui-xia LÜ
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Acid Anhydride Hydrolases; analysis; genetics; Breast; pathology; Breast Neoplasms; genetics; Chromosome Fragile Sites; Female; Genes, Tumor Suppressor; Humans; Hyperplasia; Neoplasm Proteins; analysis; genetics; Oxidoreductases; analysis; genetics; Tumor Suppressor Proteins; analysis; genetics; WW Domain-Containing Oxidoreductase
- From: Chinese Medical Journal 2008;121(20):1969-1974
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUNDWWOX and FHIT are two candidate tumor suppressor genes located in active fragile sites, the damage of which has been associated with the development of breast cancer. The association of the expression of these genes and the development of breast cancer has not been fully explored. We evaluated mRNA and protein expression of WWOX and FHIT in breast tissue with normal histological appearances, atypical ductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, and invasive cancer to see if a progressive decline in expression was present.
METHODSReverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting were used to evaluate the specimens for mRNA and protein expression, including 28 specimens with normal tissue, 28 specimens with atypical ductal hyperplasia, 33 specimens with ductal carcinoma in situ, and 51 specimens with invasive ductal carcinoma.
RESULTSCompared with in situ and invasive cancer specimens, both normal and atypical hyperplasia specimens had greater rates of detectable mRNA (WWOX rate ratio = 2.95, 95% CI 1.24 - 7.08; FHIT rate ratio = 4.58, 95% CI 1.82 - 11.81) and Western blotting detectable protein (WWOX rate ratio = 4.12, 95% CI 1.63 - 10.73; FHIT rate ratio = 3.76, 95% CI 1.44 - 10.06). For both proteins, differences between normal and atypical hyperplasia specimens and between in situ and invasive carcinoma specimens were explainable by chance (P > 0.05 for each analysis). Within each histological category, differences among fractions of specimens showed that FHIT and WWOX mRNA and protein expression were explainable by chance (P > 0.05 for each analysis).
CONCLUSIONExpression of FHIT and WWOX decreases along with breast tissue progress from a normal histological appearance to atypical ductal hyperplasia, in situ cancer, and the final invasive cancer.