The usefulness of non-invasive liver stiffness measurements in predicting clinically significant portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients: Korean data.
10.3350/cmh.2013.19.4.370
- Author:
Won Ki HONG
1
;
Moon Young KIM
;
Soon Koo BAIK
;
Seung Yong SHIN
;
Jung Min KIM
;
Yong Seok KANG
;
Yoo Li LIM
;
Young Ju KIM
;
Youn Zoo CHO
;
Hye Won HWANG
;
Jin Hyung LEE
;
Myeong Hun CHAE
;
Hyoun A KIM
;
Hye Won KANG
;
Sang Ok KWON
Author Information
1. Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Korea. drkimmy@yonsei.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Keywords:
Portal hypertension;
Liver stiffness measurement;
Cirrhosis
- MeSH:
Adult;
Aged;
Alcohol-Related Disorders/complications;
Area Under Curve;
*Elasticity Imaging Techniques;
Female;
Hepatitis B/complications;
Hepatitis C/complications;
Humans;
Hypertension, Portal/*complications/*diagnosis;
Linear Models;
Liver Cirrhosis/*complications/*diagnosis/pathology;
Male;
Middle Aged;
ROC Curve;
Republic of Korea;
Sensitivity and Specificity
- From:Clinical and Molecular Hepatology
2013;19(4):370-375
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) has been proposed as a non-invasive method for estimating the severity of fibrosis and the complications of cirrhosis. Measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the gold standard for assessing the presence of portal hypertension, but its invasiveness limits its clinical application. In this study we evaluated the relationship between LSM and HVPG, and the predictive value of LSM for clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) and severe portal hypertension in cirrhosis. METHODS: LSM was performed with transient elastography in 59 consecutive cirrhotic patients who underwent hemodynamic HVPG investigations. CSPH and severe portal hypertension were defined as HVPG > or =10 and > or =12 mmHg, respectively. Linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between LSM and HVPG. Diagnostic values were analyzed based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: A strong positive correlation between LSM and HVPG was observed in the overall population (r2=0.496, P<0.0001). The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) for the prediction of CSPH (HVPG > or =10 mmHg) was 0.851, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for an LSM cutoff value of 21.95 kPa were 82.5%, 73.7%, 86.8%, and 66.7%, respectively. The AUROC at prediction of severe portal hypertension (HVPG > or =12 mmHg) was 0.877, and the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV at LSM cutoff value of 24.25 kPa were 82.9%, 70.8%, 80.6%, and 73.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LSM exhibited a significant correlation with HVPG in patients with cirrhosis. LSM could be a non-invasive method for predicting CSPH and severe portal hypertension in Korean patients with liver cirrhosis.
