Concurrent chemoradiation with paclitaxel and platinum for locally advanced esophageal cancer.
- Author:
Ping ZHANG
1
;
Cong-Ying XIE
;
Shi-Xiu WU
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; adverse effects; therapeutic use; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; drug therapy; pathology; radiotherapy; Cisplatin; administration & dosage; Combined Modality Therapy; Esophageal Neoplasms; drug therapy; pathology; radiotherapy; Esophagitis; chemically induced; etiology; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Leukopenia; chemically induced; etiology; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm Staging; Organoplatinum Compounds; administration & dosage; Paclitaxel; administration & dosage; Particle Accelerators; Radiotherapy Dosage; Radiotherapy, High-Energy; adverse effects; methods; Remission Induction; Survival Rate; Thrombocytopenia; chemically induced; etiology
- From: Chinese Journal of Oncology 2007;29(10):773-777
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
UNLABELLEDOBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiation with paclitaxel and platinum and external irradiation, and to compare the effect of extensive regional field irradiation with conventional local field irradiation for locally advanced esophageal cancer.
METHODSFrom Oct. 2000 to Jan. 2006, 89 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer were registered in this study. All patients were inoperable or refused to undergo operation. Patients were divided into two groups: extensive regional field group (51 patients) and conventional field group (38 patients). Patients received radiotherapy at a total dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions within 7 weeks,and concurrent paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 on D1, cisplatin 20 mg/m2 on D1-D3, or oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on D2 in the fist and fourth week of external radiation.
RESULTSOf these patients, 87.6% completed the treatment regimen with a response rate of 75.5% and 66.7% in the extensive regional field group and conventional field group, respectively. Grade 3 or severe toxicities of leucopenia (33.3% vs. 23.7%), thrombocytopenia (76.0% vs. 2.6%), and esophagitis (17.7% vs. 26.3%) were observed in extensive regional field group and conventional field group, respectively. Major late toxic effect was lung fibrosis. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of the toxicity profile between two groups. The overall 3-year survival rates was 32.8%, and the overall 3-year recurrence and metastasis-free survival rates was 34.5%. The overall 3-year locoregional control rate was 44.0%. No significant difference was found between two groups in the 3-year survival (38.2% % vs. 28.1%, P = 0.59). For the patients with stage II and stage III cancers who completed the planned treatment, large regional field radiotherapy significantly improved the 3-year survival (57.3% vs. 22.2% , P = 0.03) or 3-year recurrent and metastasis-free survival (55.5% vs. 23.0%, P = 0.03) or 3-year locoregional control (65.9% vs. 30.2%, P = 0.02) than conventional field radiotherapy.
CONCLUSIONhistorical results, the combination of paclitaxel/platinum and radiation in this study can improve the survival for locally advanced esophageal, and the side effect is well tolerated. Compared with the conventional field group, concurrent chemoradiotherapy with the large regional field can significantly improve 3-year survival and locoregional control for stage II or stage III esophageal cancer.