OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen: XELOX (Capecitabine puls Oxaliplatin) used after curative resection for stage III colorectal cancer.

METHODSFrom Jan. 1998 to Jan. 2004, 256 cases with stage III colorectal cancer randomized received de Gramont, modified FOLFOX4 (mFOLFOX4) and XELOX regimens. The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared within the three groups and relative prognosis factors within mFOLFOX4 and XELOX groups. Therapeutic adverse events were recorded and analyzed with Kaplan-Meier test.

RESULTS98, 87 and 71 cases were respectively enrolled in the de Gramont, mFOLFOX4 and XELOX groups, mFOLFOX4 and XELOX had superior efficacy compared with de Gramont regimen. The two former could significantly improve 3-year DFS (79.7% vs. 66.2%, P = 0.015; 81.5% vs. 66.2%, P = 0.004) and medium survival time (40.2 mon vs. 37.8 mon, P = 0.024; 41.4 mon vs. 37.8 mon, P = 0.014). Meanwhile they could respectively decrease the ratio of recurrence risk by 18.0% (P = 0.024) and 21.0% (P = 0.003). The relative benefit of mFOLFOX4 versus XELOX didn't differ for 3-year DFS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79-1.12, P = 0.13] and OS (HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.84-1.06, P = 0.54). In the analysis of DFS in relative prognosis factors, XELOX had a better trend of survival advantage. mFOLFOX4 had higher adverse events within these regimens, especially in grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and peripheral neurologic adverse events.

CONCLUSIONXELOX maintains its efficacy and safety ratio in advanced colorectal cancer. Patients have good tolerance and compliance. The regiment is deserves to be applied in clinical treatment. Oxaliplatin;