OBJECTIVETo investigate how to select an appropriate surgical approach in the management of fracture and dislocation of lower cervical spine combined spinal cord injury.

METHODSThe clinical data of 54 patients of lower cervical spine fracture and dislocation were retrospectively analyzed. There were 29 cases with vertebral body compressive fracture and dislocation, 7 cases with vertebral body bursting fracture and dislocation, 3 cases with unilateral facet dislocation, 15 cases with bilateral facet dislocation. All cases were associated with spinal cord injury. According to American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grades, 21 cases were in A grade, 5 cases in B grade, 22 cases in C grade and 6 cases in D grade. All patients had surgical reduction, decompression, stabilization and fusion, 43 cases in anterior approach and 11 cases in posterior approach.

RESULTSAll patients were followed up in 12 to 36 months, the mean follow-up time was 18 months. There were no great vessels, trachea, esophagus or spinal cord iatrogenic injury. There were no pull-out and breakage of screws or plates. Fusion was achieved in all patients at an average of 12 weeks postoperatively. There were no pseudarthrosis or bone nonunion. Of all the patients, 96.3% were acquired completely reduction and the normal intervertebral height and lordosis were maintained. Patients with complete spinal cord had no neurologic recovery, but they felt relief from upper limb pain or numb. Incomplete spinal cord lesions improved on average 1-2 Frankel grade after surgery.

CONCLUSIONSFor lower cervical spine fracture and dislocation, an ideal anatomy reduction can be obtained with either anterior or posterior approach surgery. It is important to select a suitable surgical approach according to different types of cervical fracture and dislocation.