Treatment of middle/late stage primary hepatic carcinoma by Chinese medicine comprehensive therapy: A prospective randomized controlled study.
- Author:
Hua-qin TIAN
1
;
Hong-liang LI
;
Bin WANG
;
Gui-wen LIANG
;
Xiao-qing HUANG
;
Zhi-qing HUANG
;
Jiang-ming LANG
;
Yu-ping ZHANG
;
Xue-Zhang CHEN
;
Yin-song CHEN
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Administration, Cutaneous; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; administration & dosage; Brucea; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; pathology; therapy; Chemoembolization, Therapeutic; methods; Combined Modality Therapy; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; administration & dosage; Female; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; pathology; therapy; Male; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; methods; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Single-Blind Method; Treatment Outcome
- From: Chinese journal of integrative medicine 2010;16(2):102-108
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo observe the efficacy of Chinese medicine comprehensive therapeutic project in treating the middle/late stage primary hepatic carcinoma (PHC).
METHODSWith prospective randomized controlled design, 97 patients with PHC were assigned to the test group (49 cases) treated with Chinese medicine comprehensive therapy using Oleum fructus bruceas intervention combining oral intake of Ganji Decoction and external application of Ailitong, and the control group (48 cases) treated with chemotherapeutic agents combining iodized oil chemo-embolization and analgesics. The immediate and long-term efficacy, adverse reaction, pain-relieving initial time (PRIT) and pain-relieving sustained time (PRST) of the treatment, as well as the change in relieving patients' quality of life (QOL) were observed.
RESULTSThe difference between the two groups in illness control rate was statistically insignificant (P>0.05), but the adverse reaction occurrence rate in the test group was lesser than that in the control group (P<0.05). PRIT was insignificantly different in the two groups (P>0.05), but the PRST was significantly superior in the test group than that in the control group (10.37+/-2.18 h vs 7.78+/-1.95 h, P<0.01). After treatment, the increased Karnofsky scores in the test group indicated that the patients' somatic activity, symptoms and QOL were improved significantly, which were significantly superior to those in the control group (P<0.05). The survival rate in the two groups was similar at the 3rd month after treatment, but the test group did show superiority in terms of half- and 1-year survival rate (65.9% vs 42.5% and 38.6% vs 18.1%, respectively, P<0.05). The median survival time in the test group was 8.9 months and that in the control group was 5.3 months.
CONCLUSIONChinese medicine comprehensive therapy is an effective treatment for the middle/late stage patients of PHC, and it could extend the PRST, improve the patients' QOL and long-term survival with less adverse reaction.