Factors Affecting Acute Pain Management for Ureter Stone Patients in the Emergency Department.
- Author:
Jong Won BAEK
1
;
Won Young SUNG
;
Jang Young LEE
;
Won Suk LEE
;
Young Mo YANG
;
Sang Won SEO
Author Information
1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea. sage77@eulji.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Urolithiasis;
Analgesics;
Pain scale;
Hydroneprosis
- MeSH:
Acute Pain;
Analgesics;
Creatinine;
Edema;
Emergencies;
Hematuria;
Humans;
Hydronephrosis;
Renal Colic;
Ureter;
Urolithiasis
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
2013;24(4):410-419
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The most important step for patients who come to the emergency department with ureter stones is acute pain management. There have been insufficient studies on what factors affect acute pain management for ureteral colic the most. In this study, patients with ureteral colic were divided into two groups: one group, in which the pain was first managed with an analgesic, and another group with unmanaged pain, to find factors that most affect additive analgesics administration for ureter stones. METHODS: There were 121 patients, eventually confirmed for the presence of ureter stones through a computed tomography CT scan, included in this study. When ureter stones were suspected after the initial patient evaluation, initial pain was assessed through numerical rating scale (NRS) and the first analgesic was administered once. Pain was reassessed through NRS after 30 minutes. At that time, if the pain was managed, the patient was assigned to Group 1. If the pain persisted, another analgesic was administered for the second and third time, and the patient was assigned to Group 2. Finally, ureter stones were identified through CT scan. RESULTS: There were 58 patients (47.9%) in Group 1 and 63 patients (52.1%) in Group 2. There were no statistically significant differences in average age, serum creatinine, size of ureter stone, and severity of hematuria between the two groups. The differences in NRS measured initially and after 30 minutes were statistically significant (7.6+/-1.4 vs. 8.6+/-1.2, p<0.001; 1.4+/-1.3 vs. 6.6+/-1.9, p<0.001, respectively). The presence of hydronephrosis and perirenal edema were also statistically significant (p<0.001, p=0.007). The affecting factor for the administration of additive analgesics was hydronephrosis (odds ratio 7.213, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Hydronephrosis is an important factor in the treatment of patients with additive analgesics. It can also be used as a predictive index to assess the severity of pain in patients with ureter stones.
