Biomechanical comparison of gourd-shaped LCP versus LCP for fixation of comminuted tibial shaft fracture.
10.1007/s11596-013-1106-y
- Author:
Guo-hui XU
1
;
Bo LIU
;
Qi ZHANG
;
Juan WANG
;
Wei CHEN
;
Yue-ju LIU
;
A-qin PENG
;
Ying-ze ZHANG
Author Information
1. Department of Trauma Emergency Center, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China. xuguohui2001@126.com
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Bone Plates;
Compressive Strength;
Elastic Modulus;
Equipment Failure Analysis;
Fracture Fixation, Internal;
instrumentation;
Humans;
In Vitro Techniques;
Prosthesis Design;
Stress, Mechanical;
Tensile Strength;
Tibial Fractures;
physiopathology;
surgery
- From:
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Medical Sciences)
2013;33(2):250-257
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to compare monotonic biomechanical properties of gourd-shaped LCP fixation with LCP fixation of human tibial shaft in gap fracture mode. Twenty paired fresh cadaveric human tibias were randomly divided into 4 groups (5 pairs each): (1) axial loading single cycle to failure testing, (2) torsion single cycle to failure testing, (3) 4-point bending single cycle to failure testing, and (4) dynamic 4-point bending testing. A 7-hole 4.5 mm gourd-shaped LCP was secured on the anteromedial surface of 1 randomly selected bone from each pair, respectively, using 6 locking screws in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 6th and 7th hole with the middle hole unfilled and just located at the mid-diaphysis of the tibia. A 7-hole 4.5 mm LCP was secured on the other bone with the same method. Standard AO/ASIF techniques were used. After fixation finished, a 10 mm gap in the mid-diaphysis of tibia was created, centrally located at the unfilled hole. The axial, torsional, and bending stiffness and failure strengths were calculated from the collected data in static testings and statistically compared using paired Student's t-test. The 4-point bending fatigue lives of the two constructs were calculated from the dynamic testing data and also statistically compared using paired Student's t-test. Failure modes were recorded and visually analyzed. P<0.05 was considered significant. Results showed that the axial, torsional and bending stiffness of gourd-shaped LCP construct was greater (4%, 19%, 12%, respectively, P<0.05) than that of the LCP construct, and the axial, torsional and bending failure strengths of gourd-shaped LCP construct were stronger (10%, 46%, 29%, respectively, P<0.05) than those of the LCP construct. Both constructs failed as a result of plate plastic torsional deformation. After axial loading and 4-point bending testings, LCP failed in term of an obvious deformation of bent apex just at the unfilled plate hole, while the gourd-shaped LCP failed in term of a deformation of bent arc between the 3rd and 5th holes, which indicated a more consistent stress distribution on gourd-shaped LCP. Fatigue life of gourd-shaped LCP construct was significantly greater than LCP construct (153 836±2 228 vs. 132 471±6 460 cycles, P<0.01). All constructs failed as a result of fracture of the plate through the compression hole of the unfilled combination screw hole. The biomechanical testing showed that gourd-shaped LCP can provide greater stiffness and strength, and longer fatigue life than LCP. The gourd-shaped LCP may be more advantageous mechanically and may reduce the plate breakage rate clinically.
