Differences in the Determination of Cause and Manner of 127 Natural Death Cases by Postmortem Inspection and Autopsy.
10.7580/kjlm.2013.37.1.9
- Author:
Gi Yeong HUH
;
Kwang Hoon KIM
;
Gam Rae JO
;
Sang Yong LEE
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Cause of death;
Manner of death;
Postmortem inspection;
Autopsy;
Forensic pathologists
- MeSH:
Agrochemicals;
Alcoholism;
Autopsy;
Cardiovascular Diseases;
Cause of Death;
Korea;
Liver Diseases
- From:Korean Journal of Legal Medicine
2013;37(1):9-13
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Medico-legal investigations in Korea depend mostly on postmortem inspection without autopsy. Both untrained physicians and experienced forensic pathologists may not be able to determine the cause and manner of death only by postmortem inspection. The aim of our study was to show the limitations of postmortem inspection by evaluating the discrepancy between the results of postmortem inspection and autopsy after natural death. The manner of death by postmortem inspection changed to unnatural death in 9.4% of the cases (12 cases/127 cases) after autopsy. The cause of death in most cases was consumption of alcohol, agricultural chemicals, and antipsychotic intoxication. The cause of death by postmortem inspection changed in 24.3% of the cases (26 cases/107 cases) among cases of confirmed natural death after autopsy. The positive predictive value of cause of death by postmortem inspection was higher for cardiovascular disease (79.0%) and lower for chronic alcoholism and/or chronic liver disease (28.6%). This study shows that forensic pathologists could make considerable errors in determining the cause and manner of death without autopsy and emphasizes the necessity to refine medico-legal investigations in Korea by introducing the limited autopsy with toxicologic study and supportive postmortem imaging.
